Suppr超能文献

[纸片法进行抗生素敏感性试验。5种商业系统的比较评估]

[Antibiotic susceptibility testing by the disk method. Comparative evaluation of 5 commercial systems].

作者信息

Margalejo H, Brun Y, Messy P, Fleurette J

出版信息

Pathol Biol (Paris). 1984 Jun;32(5 Pt 2):483-7.

PMID:6431378
Abstract

The systems studied were: bioMerieux, Difco, Institut Pasteur Production, Oxoid (media, discs, standards of interpretation). Each batch was tested for pH value and calcium and magnesium concentrations. The activity of 19 antibiotics was determined by use of three reference strains (E. coli ATCC 25922, S. aureus ATCC 25923, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853). The most suitable inoculum was defined after testing three different methods of preparation. The susceptibility of each strain to each antibiotic was studied 30 times using each system. The reproducibility of the diameters with each system and the intersystem variance was calculated. This allowed groups of homogeneity between the different systems to be defined. The results were interpreted according to the various existing standards (manufacturer, French committee of SFM, WHO) yielding an overall discordance of 0,29%, of little practical importance. Finally the reliability of each system was evaluated according to WHO, data. The Difco medium gave the most accurate results with the other media tending to produce excessively large zones of inhibition.

摘要

所研究的系统包括

生物梅里埃、迪弗科、巴斯德研究所生产部、奥克托(培养基、药敏纸片、解释标准)。对每一批次进行pH值、钙和镁浓度检测。使用三种参考菌株(大肠杆菌ATCC 25922、金黄色葡萄球菌ATCC 25923、铜绿假单胞菌ATCC 27853)测定19种抗生素的活性。在测试了三种不同的制备方法后确定了最合适的接种物。使用每个系统对每种菌株对每种抗生素的敏感性进行30次研究。计算每个系统抑菌圈直径的重复性以及系统间差异。这使得能够定义不同系统之间的同质性组。根据各种现有标准(制造商、法国SFM委员会、世界卫生组织)对结果进行解释,总体不一致率为0.29%,实际重要性不大。最后,根据世界卫生组织的数据评估每个系统的可靠性。迪弗科培养基给出的结果最准确,其他培养基往往产生过大的抑菌圈。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验