Suppr超能文献

执业内科医生在药物对照试验后对高血压患者进行的长期随访研究。

Long-term follow-up study of hypertensive patients by practicing internists after a controlled drug trial.

作者信息

Waeber B, Avigdor L, Brunner H R

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1984;6(4):509-17.

PMID:6432326
Abstract

Thirty patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension were treated for an average of 44 months by 14 internists in private practice. All patients had previously participated in a controlled comparative trial of antihypertensive drugs carried out by the same physicians in their offices. During the long-term follow-up period, ie, after completion of the initial trial, the physicians administered antihypertensive therapy based on their best judgment; the drugs they most commonly prescribed were diuretics (80% of patients) and beta-blocking agents (60% of patients). Although 80% of the patients received at least two different antihypertensive agents, diastolic pressures fell below 96 mmHg in approximately 60% of the patients and below 90 mmHg in only a small fraction. Thus it appears that it is not easy for physicians in private practice to optimally reduce blood pressure levels in hypertensive patients despite the availability of numerous antihypertensive drugs. The tendency of practitioners to approximate blood pressure levels to multiples of 5 or even 10 mmHg may be partially responsible for the unsatisfactory results.

摘要

14名私人执业的内科医生对30例单纯原发性高血压患者进行了平均44个月的治疗。所有患者此前都参与了由这些医生在其诊所进行的降压药对照比较试验。在长期随访期间,即在初始试验完成后,医生根据自己的最佳判断进行降压治疗;他们最常开的药物是利尿剂(80%的患者)和β受体阻滞剂(60%的患者)。尽管80%的患者至少接受了两种不同的降压药,但约60%的患者舒张压降至96 mmHg以下,只有一小部分患者舒张压降至90 mmHg以下。因此,尽管有多种降压药可供使用,但私人执业的医生要想最佳地降低高血压患者的血压水平似乎并不容易。从业者将血压水平近似为5或甚至10 mmHg倍数的倾向可能是导致结果不理想的部分原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验