Prien R F, Kupfer D J, Mansky P A, Small J G, Tuason V B, Voss C B, Johnson W E
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984 Nov;41(11):1096-104. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790220086014.
In a double-blind, long-term follow-up study, 117 bipolar patients received lithium carbonate, imipramine hydrochloride, or both and 150 unipolar patients received lithium carbonate, imipramine, both lithium carbonate and imipramine, or placebo. With bipolar patients, lithium carbonate and the combination treatment were superior to imipramine in preventing manic recurrences and were as effective as imipramine in preventing manic recurrences and were as effective as imipramine in preventing depressive episodes. The combination treatment provided no advantage over lithium carbonate alone. With unipolar patients, imipramine and the combination treatment were more effective than lithium carbonate and placebo in preventing depressive recurrences. The combination treatment provided no advantage over imipramine alone. The lithium carbonate-treated group had fewer manic episodes than the other groups. Treatment outcome, which was evaluated primarily in terms of the occurrence of major depression or manic episodes, was significantly related to characteristics of the index episode, ie, the episode that brought the patient into the study.
在一项双盲长期随访研究中,117名双相情感障碍患者接受了碳酸锂、盐酸丙咪嗪或两者联合治疗,150名单相情感障碍患者接受了碳酸锂、丙咪嗪、碳酸锂与丙咪嗪联合治疗或安慰剂治疗。对于双相情感障碍患者,碳酸锂及联合治疗在预防躁狂复发方面优于丙咪嗪,在预防抑郁发作方面与丙咪嗪效果相当。联合治疗并不比单独使用碳酸锂更具优势。对于单相情感障碍患者,丙咪嗪及联合治疗在预防抑郁复发方面比碳酸锂和安慰剂更有效。联合治疗并不比单独使用丙咪嗪更具优势。碳酸锂治疗组的躁狂发作次数少于其他组。治疗结果主要根据重度抑郁或躁狂发作的发生情况进行评估,与索引发作(即促使患者进入研究的发作)的特征显著相关。