Ebrahim S, Hedley R, Sheldon M
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Nov 10;289(6454):1273-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6454.1273.
The characteristics of random samples of elderly patients (over 65 years of age), designated as consulters (n = 200) and non-consulters (n = 196), in a group general practice were compared using a postal questionnaire that was validated by comparison with findings by general practitioners in a random sample of 58 responders. A response rate of 90% was obtained, and all non-responders were visited by their general practitioner. The questionnaire had a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 82% when compared with general practitioner findings. The use of hospital and social services by non-consulters was low in this practice. Measures of disability and state of health showed that non-consulters were a fit group of the aged. Case finding for problems among elderly people should initially be confined to consulters, who have a high prevalence of problems. Non-consulters are a low risk group that can be assessed only with special effort and extra resources. Once an effective case finding system has been developed it might then be reasonable to consider ways of finding the few patients who have problems but do not consult their doctor.
通过一份邮寄问卷,对一组全科医疗中65岁以上老年患者的随机样本(分为咨询者,n = 200;非咨询者,n = 196)的特征进行了比较。该问卷通过与58名应答者的随机样本中全科医生的调查结果进行比较而得到验证。问卷的回复率为90%,所有未回复者均由其全科医生进行了走访。与全科医生的调查结果相比,该问卷的敏感度为79%,特异度为82%。在该医疗实践中,非咨询者对医院和社会服务的利用率较低。残疾和健康状况指标显示,非咨询者是健康的老年人群体。老年人问题的病例发现最初应局限于咨询者,他们存在问题的患病率较高。非咨询者是低风险群体,只有付出特别努力并投入额外资源才能对其进行评估。一旦建立了有效的病例发现系统,那么考虑寻找那些有问题但未咨询医生的少数患者的方法可能是合理的。