Suppr超能文献

直肠出血:患病率及咨询行为

Rectal bleeding: prevalence and consultation behaviour.

作者信息

Crosland A, Jones R

机构信息

Department of Primary Health Care, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.

出版信息

BMJ. 1995 Aug 19;311(7003):486-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7003.486.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine prevalence of rectal bleeding in the community and to examine factors that lead some patients to consult their general practitioner about rectal bleeding while others do not.

DESIGN

Questionnaire survey followed by semistructured interviews of sample of respondents with rectal bleeding.

SETTING

Two general practices on Tyneside.

SUBJECTS

2000 adult patients registered with the general practices were sent a validated questionnaire. Respondents with rectal bleeding were divided into consulters and non-consulters, and 30 patients from each group (matched for age, sex, and characteristics of bleeding) were interviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of rectal bleeding, proportion of subjects with rectal bleeding who sought medical advice, and reasons for consulting or not consulting a doctor about rectal bleeding.

RESULTS

287 of the 1200 respondents to the questionnaire had noticed rectal bleeding at some time in their lives, and 231 had noticed it within previous 12 months. Only 118 (41%) of all respondents with rectal bleeding had ever sought medical advice for the problem. Those aged over 60 were most likely to have consulted, as were those who reported blood mixed with their stools. Main difference between those who had sought medical advice and those who had not was that consulters were more likely than non-consulters to perceive their symptoms as serious.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rectal bleeding is common, only minority of patients seek medical of symptoms seems to be most important factor in deciding whether to consult a doctor for rectal bleeding.

摘要

目的

确定社区中直肠出血的患病率,并探究导致一些直肠出血患者向全科医生咨询而另一些患者未咨询的因素。

设计

问卷调查,随后对直肠出血的受访者样本进行半结构式访谈。

地点

泰恩赛德的两家全科诊所。

研究对象

向在这两家全科诊所注册的2000名成年患者发放经过验证的问卷。直肠出血的受访者被分为咨询者和未咨询者,并对每组30名患者(按年龄、性别和出血特征匹配)进行访谈。

主要观察指标

直肠出血的患病率、直肠出血患者中寻求医疗建议的比例,以及就直肠出血咨询或不咨询医生的原因。

结果

1200名问卷受访者中有287人在生活中的某些时候注意到直肠出血,231人在过去12个月内注意到。所有直肠出血的受访者中只有118人(41%)曾就该问题寻求过医疗建议。60岁以上的人以及报告大便中带血的人最有可能咨询过。寻求医疗建议者和未寻求医疗建议者之间的主要差异在于,咨询者比未咨询者更有可能将自己的症状视为严重。

结论

尽管直肠出血很常见,但只有少数患者寻求医疗建议。对症状的认知似乎是决定是否就直肠出血咨询医生的最重要因素。

相似文献

1
Rectal bleeding: prevalence and consultation behaviour.直肠出血:患病率及咨询行为
BMJ. 1995 Aug 19;311(7003):486-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7003.486.
3
Delay in consulting a medical practitioner about rectal bleeding.延迟就直肠出血问题咨询医生。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Jun;46(3):241-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.3.241.
8
Rectal bleeding and implications for surgical care in Nepal.尼泊尔的直肠出血及其对手术治疗的影响。
J Surg Res. 2015 Jul;197(1):12-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.02.048. Epub 2015 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

3
Gastrointestinal Tract Disorders in Older Age.老年人群的胃肠道疾病。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan 17;2019:6757524. doi: 10.1155/2019/6757524. eCollection 2019.
6
Diagnostic Evaluation of Patients Presenting to Primary Care with Rectal Bleeding.初诊有直肠出血症状患者的诊断评估。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Apr;33(4):415-422. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4273-x. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
8
Diagnosis: shifting the ROC curve.诊断:移动ROC曲线。
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Sep;62(602):452-3. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X653796.

本文引用的文献

3
Significance of bowel symptoms.肠道症状的意义。
Med J Aust. 1987 Jun 15;146(12):631-3. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1987.tb120441.x.
8
Rectal bleeding. Patient delay in presentation.直肠出血。患者就诊延迟。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1990 Oct;33(10):851-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02051921.
9
Irritable bowel syndrome in the general population.普通人群中的肠易激综合征
BMJ. 1992 Jan 11;304(6819):87-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6819.87.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验