Biou D, Monnet D, Millet F, Feger J, Durand G
J Immunol Methods. 1984 Nov 30;74(2):267-71. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(84)90293-x.
When radial immunodiffusion (RID) and electroimmunodiffusion (EID) were used for the determination of rat alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (alpha 1-AGP) a significant discrepancy in the results was encountered depending on the degree of sialylation. When alpha 1-AGP was desialylated, the amounts estimated by EID were much lower than those actually present as assayed by the RID method. The relationship between the percentage of desialylation of alpha 1-AGP and the percentage of its underestimation by EID relative to RID was determined and a calibration curve was plotted to evaluate the degree of desialylation of rat alpha 1-AGP. When compared to other procedures (rat membrane inhibition assay and isoelectrofocusing), the proposed method was easier to perform and allowed the specific evaluation of the degree of undersialylation of the glycoprotein.
当采用放射免疫扩散法(RID)和电免疫扩散法(EID)测定大鼠α1-酸性糖蛋白(α1-AGP)时,根据唾液酸化程度,结果出现了显著差异。当α1-AGP去唾液酸化后,EID法估算的含量远低于RID法测定的实际含量。测定了α1-AGP去唾液酸化百分比与其被EID法相对于RID法低估的百分比之间的关系,并绘制了校准曲线以评估大鼠α1-AGP的去唾液酸化程度。与其他方法(大鼠膜抑制试验和等电聚焦)相比,该方法操作更简便,能对糖蛋白唾液酸化不足的程度进行特异性评估。