Lamping D L, Spring B, Gelenberg A J
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1984;84(2):254-61. doi: 10.1007/BF00427455.
Forty outpatients with primary depression were randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to treatment with amitriptyline (a tricyclic antidepressant) or clovoxamine (a nontricyclic, experimental antidepressant). Memory and depression were assessed during a pretreatment baseline period and at the end of days 4, 7, and 28 of drug treatment. A signal detection recognition memory task and conventional memory measures (including the Benton Visual Retention, Wechsler Logical Memory, and verbal learning tests) were used to assess memory. Although both drugs led to comparable clinical improvement in depression, they affected memory performance differently. The signal detection recognition memory task detected an impairment in memory after chronic amitriptyline administration, as contrasted with an improvement in memory after chronic administration of clovoxamine. The memory impairment in the amitriptyline group and improvement in the clovoxamine group were the result of changes in sensitivity [P(A)]. No changes in response bias (B) were detected. Conventional memory tests failed to detect drug-related differences in memory between the two groups. On the Benton, errors decreased over time within both drug treatment groups, whereas correct reproductions increased within the amitriptyline group only. However, between-group differences on the Benton did not reach significance. Results from the signal detection task suggest an amitriptyline-associated memory impairment. However, this interpretation is tempered by the finding that conventional memory measures failed to detect differences in memory performance between the two groups. We discuss the limitations of traditional memory measures and the utility of a signal detection approach in studies of psychopharmacologic influences on memory.
40名原发性抑郁症门诊患者被随机双盲分配接受阿米替林(一种三环类抗抑郁药)或氯伏沙明(一种非三环类实验性抗抑郁药)治疗。在治疗前的基线期以及药物治疗第4、7和28天结束时评估记忆和抑郁情况。使用信号检测识别记忆任务和传统记忆测量方法(包括本顿视觉保持测验、韦氏逻辑记忆测验和言语学习测验)来评估记忆。尽管两种药物在抑郁方面导致了相当的临床改善,但它们对记忆表现的影响不同。与慢性服用氯伏沙明后记忆改善形成对比的是,信号检测识别记忆任务检测到慢性服用阿米替林后存在记忆损害。阿米替林组的记忆损害和氯伏沙明组的记忆改善是敏感性[P(A)]变化的结果。未检测到反应偏差(B)的变化。传统记忆测试未能检测到两组之间与药物相关的记忆差异。在本顿测验中,两个药物治疗组的错误随着时间推移都减少了,而只有阿米替林组的正确再现次数增加。然而,两组在本顿测验上的差异未达到显著水平。信号检测任务的结果表明存在与阿米替林相关的记忆损害。然而,传统记忆测量方法未能检测到两组之间记忆表现的差异这一发现缓和了这一解释。我们讨论了传统记忆测量方法的局限性以及信号检测方法在精神药理学对记忆影响研究中的效用。