Fontaine G, Cansell A, Lechat P, Frank R, Tonet J L, Grosgogeat Y
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1984 Nov;77(12):1307-14.
Endocavitary catheter ablation is a new method of treating cardiac arrhythmias. It may be used indirectly, interrupting conduction through the His bundle in supraventricular arrhythmias, or directly by altering the arrhythmogenic substrate to prevent ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. We have observed, together with other workers, that changes in the electrical properties of the catheters used to deliver the endocavitary electrical discharge. This was unexpected as the shock was delivered through a unipolar electrode with the indifferent electrode placed on the patient's back. An analysis of the morphology of the discharge impulse in intensity and voltage at increasing energy values showed that the unconnected electrodes of the multi-electrode catheter were raised to approximately the same voltage as the indifferent electrode. The change in electrical properties of some catheters was therefore the result of an insulation defect between the conducting wires leading to the electrodes. A study of the rupturing voltage of 32 USCI endocavitary catheters showed that 5 were able to sustain repeated shocks of 2 Kv and that 3 were able to sustain 3.5 Kv. The insulation of Cordis catheters was good but problems were encountered due to the resistance of the wires leading to the electrodes which dissipated an abnormally high amount of energy, so reducing the energy actually reaching the myocardium. These observations may explain the inconsistency of results obtained by different groups performing endocavitary catheter ablation with material not designed specifically for this purpose.
心腔内导管消融是一种治疗心律失常的新方法。它可间接用于通过希氏束中断室上性心律失常的传导,或直接通过改变致心律失常基质来预防室性心动过速或颤动。我们与其他研究人员一起观察到,用于进行心腔内放电的导管的电学性质发生了变化。这出乎意料,因为电击是通过置于患者背部的无关电极的单极电极进行的。对在能量值增加时放电脉冲强度和电压的形态分析表明,多电极导管未连接的电极升高到与无关电极大致相同的电压。因此,一些导管电学性质的变化是通向电极的导线之间绝缘缺陷的结果。对32根美国导管工业公司心腔内导管的破裂电压研究表明,5根能够承受2千伏的重复电击,3根能够承受3.5千伏的电击。科迪斯导管的绝缘良好,但由于通向电极的导线电阻消耗了异常大量的能量,导致实际到达心肌的能量减少,从而出现了问题。这些观察结果可能解释了不同研究小组使用并非专门为此目的设计的材料进行心腔内导管消融所获得结果的不一致性。