• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国医学物理学家协会“高能光子和电子束吸收剂量测定协议”与当前使用协议的比较。

A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.

作者信息

Hunt M A, Malik S, Thomason C, Masterson M E

出版信息

Med Phys. 1984 Nov-Dec;11(6):806-13. doi: 10.1118/1.595568.

DOI:10.1118/1.595568
PMID:6439991
Abstract

A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" (TG21) with currently used protocols for electron and photon dosimetry is presented. These protocols are the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Report 21, "Radiation Dosimetry: Electrons with Initial Energies Between 1 and 50 MeV" (ICRU21), and the AAPM "Protocol for the Dosimetry of X- and Gamma Ray Beams with Maximum Energies Between 0.6 and 50 MeV" (SCRAD). Assuming a given radiation exposure and chamber parameters, doses to water at dmax for electron beams and at 5 g/cm2 for photon beams are calculated using the three protocols and then compared. The doses for photon beams calculated using the TG21 and SCRAD protocols are found to differ by 3% or less at energies below 10 MeV. The largest differences occur in photon doses at high energies where the dose calculated with the TG21 protocol is as much as 5.5% greater than that calculated with the SCRAD protocol for a typical thimble ionization chamber. For low electron beam energies, the doses calculated with the ICRU21 protocol are as much as 5% less than TG21 doses when using thimble chambers constructed of tissue-equivalent materials in a water phantom. If dosimetry measurements are performed in polystyrene, the dose calculated using TG21 may be greater than the ICRU21 dose, depending on chamber size and composition. An explanation for some of the differences between the protocols is presented emphasizing the dependence on chamber geometry, chamber composition, and phantom composition.

摘要

本文对美国医学物理师协会(AAPM)的“高能光子和电子束吸收剂量测定协议”(TG21)与当前使用的电子和光子剂量测定协议进行了比较。这些协议分别是国际辐射单位与测量委员会报告21《辐射剂量学:初始能量在1至50 MeV之间的电子》(ICRU21)以及AAPM的“最大能量在0.6至50 MeV之间的X射线和γ射线束剂量测定协议”(SCRAD)。假设给定辐射暴露和电离室参数,使用这三种协议计算电子束在dmax处以及光子束在5 g/cm²处对水的剂量,然后进行比较。发现在能量低于10 MeV时,使用TG21和SCRAD协议计算的光子束剂量差异在3%或更小。最大差异出现在高能量光子剂量中,对于典型的指形电离室,使用TG21协议计算的剂量比使用SCRAD协议计算的剂量高出多达5.5%。对于低能量电子束,当在水模体中使用由组织等效材料制成的指形电离室时,使用ICRU21协议计算的剂量比TG21剂量低多达5%。如果在聚苯乙烯中进行剂量测定测量,根据电离室尺寸和组成,使用TG21计算的剂量可能大于ICRU21剂量。本文给出了这些协议之间一些差异的解释,强调了对电离室几何形状、电离室组成和模体组成的依赖性。

相似文献

1
A comparison of the AAPM "Protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams" with currently used protocols.美国医学物理学家协会“高能光子和电子束吸收剂量测定协议”与当前使用协议的比较。
Med Phys. 1984 Nov-Dec;11(6):806-13. doi: 10.1118/1.595568.
2
Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.计算得出的吸收剂量比,即TG51/TG21,适用于一系列光子和电子能量范围内最常用的圆柱形和平行板电离室。
Med Phys. 2002 Jul;29(7):1464-72. doi: 10.1118/1.1487857.
3
Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.临床高能电子束参考剂量学:AAPM TG - 51与AAPM TG - 21剂量学协议的比较
Med Phys. 2001 Oct;28(10):2077-87. doi: 10.1118/1.1405841.
4
AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)关于高能光子和电子束临床参考剂量测定的TG-51协议。
Med Phys. 1999 Sep;26(9):1847-70. doi: 10.1118/1.598691.
5
Comparison of IAEA 1987 and AAPM 1983 protocols for dosimetry calibration of radiotherapy beams.国际原子能机构1987年与美国医学物理学家协会1983年放射治疗束剂量校准协议的比较。
Med Phys. 1991 Jan-Feb;18(1):26-35. doi: 10.1118/1.596720.
6
Calibration of high-energy photon and electron beams for radiotherapy using AAPM 1983 and IAEA 1987 dosimetry protocols.
Med Phys. 1993 Mar-Apr;20(2 Pt 1):293-8. doi: 10.1118/1.597138.
7
Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.国际原子能机构(IAEA)TRS - 398与美国医学物理学家协会(AAPM)TG - 51高能光子和电子束剂量测定中水中吸收剂量协议的比较。
Phys Med Biol. 2001 Nov;46(11):2985-3006. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/46/11/315.
8
Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.临床高能光子束中的参考剂量学:AAPM TG - 51与AAPM TG - 21剂量学协议的比较
Med Phys. 2001 Jan;28(1):46-54. doi: 10.1118/1.1333745.
9
[Determination of absorbed dose to water for high energy photon and electron beams--comparison of different dosimetry protocols].[高能光子和电子束水吸收剂量的测定——不同剂量测定方案的比较]
Z Med Phys. 2003;13(4):281-9. doi: 10.1078/0939-3889-00182.
10
Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.不同剂量测定方案下高能光子与电子剂量测定的比较。
Med Phys. 2002 May;29(5):857-68. doi: 10.1118/1.1470208.