Beirness D, Vogel-Sprott M
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1984;84(3):393-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00555219.
Four groups of males (n = 6 each) were trained on a complex psychomotor task prior to attending five drinking sessions. They performed the task under the same dose (0.84 ml absolute alcohol/kg) on sessions 1-4. On session 5 they received a placebo. During these sessions, the first group (CR) received information and a monetary reward that was contingent on the display of nonimpaired performance under alcohol. The second group (IO) only received information about performance. The third group (NCR) received noncontingent information and reward, administered on a predetermined schedule. The fourth group (NR) received no information or reward for performance. These manipulations were predicted to influence the order of groups with respect to the rate at which tolerance developed over sessions 1-4. The findings confirmed this hypothesis, showing the rate of CR greater than IO greater than NCR greater than NR. The placebo session tested for the classically conditioned compensatory response unattenuated by alcohol. The strength of the response, observed as facilitated performance, was predicted and found to relate to the rate at which tolerance had developed (i.e., CR greater than IO greater than NCR greater than NR). This evidence for operant and classical conditioning effects in alcohol tolerance was considered to suggest that a consideration of their joint effects may be required to understand the contribution of learning to drug tolerance.
四组雄性大鼠(每组n = 6)在参加五次饮酒实验之前,先接受了一项复杂的心理运动任务训练。在第1 - 4次实验中,它们在相同剂量(0.84毫升纯酒精/千克)下执行任务。在第5次实验中,它们接受了安慰剂。在这些实验过程中,第一组(CR)收到了信息以及根据饮酒状态下未受损表现给予的金钱奖励。第二组(IO)仅收到了关于表现的信息。第三组(NCR)收到了非条件信息和奖励,按照预定时间表给予。第四组(NR)未收到关于表现的任何信息或奖励。预计这些操作会影响各组在第1 - 4次实验中耐受性发展的速率顺序。研究结果证实了这一假设,表明CR组的速率大于IO组大于NCR组大于NR组。安慰剂实验测试了未被酒精减弱的经典条件性代偿反应。观察到的作为促进表现的反应强度,预计并发现与耐受性发展的速率相关(即CR组大于IO组大于NCR组大于NR组)。这种酒精耐受性中操作性和经典条件作用效应的证据被认为表明,可能需要考虑它们的联合效应来理解学习对药物耐受性的贡献。