Lesbre J P, Genuyt L, Lalau J D, Kalisa A, Andréjak M T, Boey S
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1984 Dec;77(13):1481-93.
Forty-eight patients underwent M-Mode, 2D and pulsed Doppler echocardiography with systematic apical and subcostal examination of the mitral and tricuspid orifices to determine the value of pulsed Doppler echo in the detection of tricuspid regurgitation. The fourty-eight patients, aged 12 to 69 years, were divided into 2 groups: Group I: 27 patients referred for cardiac catheterisation usually with a view to surgery. The majority of patients had rheumatic valvular, congenital heart disease or cardiomyopathies. All of these patients had phonocardiography, right and left heart catheterisation, right ventricular angiography and measurement od cardiac output. Group II: 21 control patients with no auscultatory, radiological or electrocardiographic changes. This group was studied to determine the specificity of pulsed Doppler examination of the tricuspid valve and the patients only underwent echocardiography. Selective right ventricular angiography was selected as the reference. The sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of pulsed Doppler echocardiography in the positive diagnosis of tricuspid regurgitation were determined. Its value in quantifying tricuspid regurgitation was also analysed. The sensitivity of pulsed Doppler was 93 p. 100 in this series: all but one case of angiographically proven tricuspid regurgitation were detected by the finding of unequivocal systolic turbulence in the right atrium. The specificity of pulsed Doppler was 91 p. 100. The positive predictive value of systolic turbulence in the right atrium was 81 p. 100. The only reliable criteria for quantifying the regurgitation were the intensity of the acoustic signal and the spatial extension of intraatrial turbulent flow: all patients with turbulent flow propagating as far as the superior wall of the right atrium or the inferior vena cava had angiographically severe tricuspid regurgitation. A comparison with other paraclinical methods of detecting tricuspid regurgitation showed that pulsed Doppler echocardiography is the most sensitive tool at the clinician's disposal for diagnosing this lesion: the sensitivity of auscultation and phonocardiography was 50 p. 100, jugular pulse tracings 54 p. 100, right heart catheterisation 50 p. 100, and pulsed Doppler echocardiography 93 p. 100. Pulsed Doppler echocardiography may even be superior to angiography which has, until now, been the method of reference for diagnosing tricuspid regurgitation.
48例患者接受了M型、二维和脉冲多普勒超声心动图检查,通过系统的心尖和肋下检查二尖瓣和三尖瓣口,以确定脉冲多普勒超声在检测三尖瓣反流中的价值。这48例患者年龄在12至69岁之间,分为2组:第一组:27例因通常考虑手术而接受心导管检查的患者。大多数患者患有风湿性瓣膜病、先天性心脏病或心肌病。所有这些患者均进行了心音图检查、左右心导管检查、右心室造影及心输出量测量。第二组:21例无听诊、放射学或心电图改变的对照患者。对该组进行研究以确定三尖瓣脉冲多普勒检查的特异性,这些患者仅接受了超声心动图检查。选择选择性右心室造影作为参照。确定了脉冲多普勒超声心动图对三尖瓣反流阳性诊断的敏感性、特异性和预测价值。还分析了其在量化三尖瓣反流方面的价值。在本系列中,脉冲多普勒的敏感性为93%:除1例经血管造影证实的三尖瓣反流病例外,其余病例均通过在右心房发现明确的收缩期湍流得以检测出。脉冲多普勒的特异性为91%。右心房收缩期湍流的阳性预测值为81%。量化反流的唯一可靠标准是声学信号的强度和心房内湍流的空间范围:所有湍流传播至右心房上壁或下腔静脉的患者经血管造影均显示为严重三尖瓣反流。与其他检测三尖瓣反流的临床辅助方法比较显示,脉冲多普勒超声心动图是临床医生可用于诊断该病变的最敏感工具:听诊和心音图检查的敏感性为50%,颈静脉搏动描记法为54%,右心导管检查为50%,而脉冲多普勒超声心动图为93%。脉冲多普勒超声心动图甚至可能优于血管造影,而血管造影迄今为止一直是诊断三尖瓣反流的参照方法。