Prescott N, Jancloes M F
Soc Sci Med. 1984;19(10):1057-60. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(84)90308-3.
This paper examines four main economic issues in the formulation of helminth control policies: whether, what, how and with whose resources to control helminthiasis. The paper argues that (i) although helminth control would have a negligible impact on mortality, its nutrition-mediated effects on improved labor productivity and intellectual performance may be significant; (ii) that reduction of helminth disease rather than infection should be the target of control policy, although the preferred intervention may still be eradication rather than continuous control; and (iii) that although the case for public subsidy of helminth control interventions is strong, the existence of serious fiscal constraints and some evidence of private willingness-to-pay for anthelminthic chemotherapy indicates a potential for partial cost recovery which should be explored.
是否控制、控制什么、如何控制以及用谁的资源来控制蠕虫病。本文认为:(i)尽管蠕虫控制对死亡率的影响微不足道,但其通过营养介导对提高劳动生产率和智力表现的影响可能很大;(ii)控制政策的目标应是减少蠕虫病而非感染,尽管首选干预措施可能仍是根除而非持续控制;(iii)尽管有充分理由由公共部门补贴蠕虫控制干预措施,但存在严重的财政限制,且有一些证据表明私人愿意为驱虫化疗付费,这表明存在部分成本回收的潜力,应加以探索。