[Comparison of clinical efficacy of ofloxacin COFLX: DL-8280) and pipemidic acid (PPA) in acute infectious diarrhea by a double-blind method. The Japan Research Committee of Ofloxacin, Research Group for Acute Infectious Diarrhea].
作者信息
Saito M, Seo T, Matsubara Y, Tomizawa I, Takizawa Y, Ito K, Konishi K, Matsunaga M, Yanagishita T, Kosugi M
出版信息
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1984 Oct;58(10):965-81. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.58.965.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
[Comparison of clinical efficacy of ofloxacin COFLX: DL-8280) and pipemidic acid (PPA) in acute infectious diarrhea by a double-blind method. The Japan Research Committee of Ofloxacin, Research Group for Acute Infectious Diarrhea].
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1984 Oct;58(10):965-81. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.58.965.
2
[Comparison of clinical usefulness of enoxacin (ENX, AT-2266) and pipemidic acid (PPA) in the treatment of acute infectious diarrhea by a double-blind method. The Japan Research Committee of Enoxacin Research Group for Acute Infectious Diarrhea].[采用双盲法比较依诺沙星（ENX，AT - 2266）与吡哌酸（PPA）治疗急性感染性腹泻的临床疗效。日本依诺沙星急性感染性腹泻研究组研究委员会]
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1984 Oct;58(10):1114-34. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.58.1114.
3
[Comparison of clinical efficacy of lomefloxacin (LFLX, NY-198) and pipemidic acid (PPA) in the treatment of infectious enteritis by a double-blind method. The Japan Research Committee of Lomefloxacin Research Group Enteritis].洛美沙星（LFLX，NY - 198）与吡哌酸（PPA）治疗感染性肠炎的双盲法临床疗效比较。洛美沙星研究组肠炎日本研究委员会
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1989 Jun;63(6):606-22. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.63.606.
4
[Comparison of clinical efficacy of ciprofloxacin (CPFX, BAY o 9867) and pipemidic acid (PPA) in the treatment of infectious enteritis by a double-blind method. The Japan Research Committee of Ciprofloxacin, Research Group for Infectious Enteritis].
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1988 Apr;62(4):322-39. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.62.322.
5
[Comparison of clinical efficacy of norfloxacin (NFLX) and pipemidic acid (PPA) in the treatment of infectious enteritis by a double-blind method. The Japan Research Committee of Norfloxacin Research Group Enteritis].
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1987 Jul;61(7):830-48. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.61.830.
6
[Comparison of clinical efficacy of pipemidic acid (PPA) and kanamycin (KM) in bacillary dysentery by double blind method].[用双盲法比较吡哌酸（PPA）与卡那霉素（KM）治疗细菌性痢疾的临床疗效]
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1983 Apr;57(4):303-17. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.57.303.
7
[Comparative studies of DL-8280 and pipemidic acid in complicated urinary tract infections by double-blind method].[采用双盲法对DL - 8280与吡哌酸治疗复杂性尿路感染的比较研究]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1984 Sep;30(9):1307-55.
8
[Ofloxacin versus pipemidic acid and co-trimoxazole].
Infection. 1986;14 Suppl 1:S93-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01645210.
9
[Antibacterial activity of norfloxacin and pipemidic acid in a randomized double-blind study].
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 1984 Jul-Sep;36(3):247-51.
10
[Clinical experience on pipemidic acid for bacillary dysentery].吡哌酸治疗细菌性痢疾的临床经验
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 1983 Apr;57(4):297-302. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.57.297.
引用本文的文献
1
Antibiotic therapy for Shigella dysentery.志贺氏菌痢疾的抗生素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 4;2010(8):CD006784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006784.pub4.
Zotero 插件