Evans D P, Burke M S, Newcombe R G
Curr Med Res Opin. 1980;6(8):540-7. doi: 10.1185/03007998009109484.
The marketed formulations of 6 analgesic preparations were compared in the treatment of patients suffering from acute exacerbations of low back pain using a crossover trial of balanced incomplete block design. Sixty out-patients with symptoms resulting from a mechanical or degenerative condition were each prescribed 3 drugs which were administered consecutively for 1 week each. The medications (and daily dosages) were coded as A --aspirin (3600 mg), B --dextropropoxyphene plus paracetamol (260 mg plus 2600 mg), C --indomethacin (150 mg), D --mefenamic acid (1500 mg), E --paracetamol (4000 mg), and F --phenylbutazone (300 mg). Daily pain scores were significantly lower (p less than 0.05) during treatment D than during treatments E and B, and significantly lower (p less than 0.05) during treatment A than during treatment B. There were large and significant differences between treatments in the percentages of recommended doses acceptable to the patients and in the number of defaults from the prescribed regimens. The patients chose F and D significantly more (p less than 0.05) often than A. Overall, there were consistently superior performances by mefenamic acid and phenylbutazone with little to choose between the two.
采用平衡不完全区组设计的交叉试验,比较了6种镇痛制剂的市售配方在治疗急性腰背痛加重患者中的效果。60名因机械性或退行性疾病出现症状的门诊患者,每人被开具3种药物,每种药物连续服用1周。这些药物(及每日剂量)编码如下:A——阿司匹林(3600毫克),B——右丙氧芬加对乙酰氨基酚(260毫克加2600毫克),C——吲哚美辛(150毫克),D——甲芬那酸(1500毫克),E——对乙酰氨基酚(4000毫克),F——保泰松(300毫克)。治疗D期间的每日疼痛评分显著低于治疗E和B期间(p<0.05),治疗A期间的每日疼痛评分显著低于治疗B期间(p<0.05)。在患者可接受的推荐剂量百分比以及规定治疗方案的未完成率方面,各治疗组之间存在很大且显著的差异。患者选择F和D的频率显著高于A(p<0.05)。总体而言,甲芬那酸和保泰松的表现始终更优,二者难分高下。