Lechner G, Powischer G, Waneck R
Rofo. 1980 Jan;132(1):68-75. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1056525.
The value of pharmaco-angiography (Priscol, angiotensin) in the diagnosis of tumourous and inflammatory diseases in bones and soft tissues was investigated in 81 patients. Priscol was used in 49 patients, angiotensin in 28 and both substances in four. It was shown that neither Priscol nor angiotensin produced results of diagnostic value, provided an optimal technique was used (antegrade, selective contrast injection with an adequate volume of contrast and in the absence of vascular spasm). Priscol was of value for reducing or preventing spasm in peripheral vessels. Angiotensin is superior to Priscol in demonstrating the angiographic criteria, but pharmaco-angiography did not result in a better distinction between tumours and inflammatory lesions.
对81例患者研究了药物血管造影术（妥拉唑啉、血管紧张素）在骨与软组织肿瘤性疾病和炎性疾病诊断中的价值。49例患者使用了妥拉唑啉，28例使用了血管紧张素，4例同时使用了这两种物质。结果表明，只要采用最佳技术（顺行、选择性造影剂注射，使用足够量的造影剂且无血管痉挛），妥拉唑啉和血管紧张素均未产生具有诊断价值的结果。妥拉唑啉在减轻或预防外周血管痉挛方面有价值。血管紧张素在显示血管造影标准方面优于妥拉唑啉，但药物血管造影术并未在肿瘤与炎性病变之间实现更好的区分。
