Suppr超能文献

输卵管环绝育术的技术失败:发生率、感知原因、结局及危险因素。

Technical failures in tubal ring sterilization: Incidence, perceived reasons, outcome, and risk factors.

作者信息

Chi I, Mumford S D, Laufe L E

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980 Oct 1;138(3):307-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(80)90254-9.

Abstract

Six centers participated in comparative studies of female sterilization conducted by the international Fertility Research Program. The incidence of technical failures (or failed attempts) was compared between patients sterilized with the tubal ring and those sterilized with other tubal occlusion techniques. The tubal ring was associated with a higher failure rate than electrocoagulation, the Rocket clip, or the modified Pomeroy technique. Of 1,035 tubal ring sterilizations, there were 38 technical failures. Reasons given by the operators for the failures, by frequency of occurrence, were surgical complications, conditions preexisting in the patients, and problems with the instruments. Most of these failures were remedied by changing to other techniques. In two patients, the procedure was completed by changing the approach from laparoscopy to laparotomy. In five others, sterilization was not completed. Case-control analysis was performed and three risk factors were delineated: obesity, prior use of an intrauterine contraceptive device and previous abdominal operations.

摘要

六个中心参与了国际生育研究计划开展的女性绝育术比较研究。对采用输卵管环绝育的患者与采用其他输卵管闭塞技术绝育的患者的技术失败率(或失败尝试率)进行了比较。与电凝术、火箭夹或改良波默罗伊技术相比,输卵管环的失败率更高。在1035例输卵管环绝育术中,有38例技术失败。术者给出的失败原因,按出现频率依次为手术并发症、患者的原有疾病以及器械问题。这些失败大多通过改用其他技术得到补救。在两名患者中,通过将手术方式从腹腔镜手术改为剖腹手术完成了手术。在另外五名患者中,绝育手术未完成。进行了病例对照分析,确定了三个风险因素:肥胖、既往使用宫内节育器以及既往腹部手术史。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验