Suppr超能文献

下腰痛的手术治疗结果:前路与后路手术的对比研究

Results of surgical treatment of low back pain: a comparative study of the anterior and posterior approach.

作者信息

Nakano N, Tomita T

出版信息

Int Orthop. 1980;4(2):101-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00271092.

Abstract

Comparative studies were made of 347 patients reviewed more than one year after the operation of disc excision for low back pain by either the anterior or posterior approach, many of whom also underwent inter-body vertebral fusion. In general the anterior approach proved superior to the posterior approach especially in cases of reoperation, largely because it avoided exposure of the spinal canal with the possible complication of bleeding or irritation of the nerve roots. There appeared to be no significant difference when fusion or no fusion was performed with an anterior approach, but with a posterior approach the results following fusion were superior to the nonfusion group. Consistently good results were attributed to correct patient selection rather than the choice of surgical technique.

摘要

对347例因下腰痛接受椎间盘切除术的患者进行了比较研究,这些患者术后均经过了一年以上的随访,手术采用前路或后路,其中许多患者还接受了椎间融合术。总体而言,前路手术优于后路手术,尤其是在再次手术的病例中,这主要是因为前路手术避免了椎管暴露,减少了出血或神经根刺激等并发症的发生。前路手术是否进行融合似乎没有显著差异,但后路手术中,融合后的效果优于未融合组。持续良好的效果归因于正确的患者选择,而非手术技术的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验