Nakano N, Tomita T
Int Orthop. 1980;4(2):101-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00271092.
Comparative studies were made of 347 patients reviewed more than one year after the operation of disc excision for low back pain by either the anterior or posterior approach, many of whom also underwent inter-body vertebral fusion. In general the anterior approach proved superior to the posterior approach especially in cases of reoperation, largely because it avoided exposure of the spinal canal with the possible complication of bleeding or irritation of the nerve roots. There appeared to be no significant difference when fusion or no fusion was performed with an anterior approach, but with a posterior approach the results following fusion were superior to the nonfusion group. Consistently good results were attributed to correct patient selection rather than the choice of surgical technique.
对347例因下腰痛接受椎间盘切除术的患者进行了比较研究,这些患者术后均经过了一年以上的随访,手术采用前路或后路,其中许多患者还接受了椎间融合术。总体而言,前路手术优于后路手术,尤其是在再次手术的病例中,这主要是因为前路手术避免了椎管暴露,减少了出血或神经根刺激等并发症的发生。前路手术是否进行融合似乎没有显著差异,但后路手术中,融合后的效果优于未融合组。持续良好的效果归因于正确的患者选择,而非手术技术的选择。