• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

溶解氧对锝-99m亚甲基二膦酸盐的影响:简要通讯

Effects of dissolved oxygen on Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate: concise communication.

作者信息

Coupal J J, Kim E E, DeLand F H

出版信息

J Nucl Med. 1981 Feb;22(2):153-6.

PMID:6450824
Abstract

Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate (MDP) was prepared using stannous methylene diphosphonate (ligand) kits of similar formula from either of two manufacturers (A or B), and physiologic saline of either regular dissolved oxygen content (RDO, 6.7 mg O2/l) or low (LDO, 3.8 mg O2/l). A resulting Tc-99m MDP dose was administered to each of 70 patients for bone imaging. The A + RDO combination led to greater film density in the bone image than did the B + RDO (p less than 0.05). However, use of LDO saline to reconstitute B improved bone-image density to equal that from A + RDO. Overall image quality with A + RDO was judged to be superior to that with either B + RDO (p less than 0.05) or B + LDO (p less than 0.01) by an investigator unaware of the particular DO and ligand combination injected. However, neither bone delineation nor soft-tissue radioactivity on images was judged to be different among the four combinations (p greater than or equal to 0.05). There was also no difference in soft-tissue radioactivity among the four combinations as revealed by image densitometry. Under the conditions of this study, the major differences in clinical performance between products A and B were only minimally affected by the O2 content of the saline used for reconstitution.

摘要

使用来自两家制造商(A或B)中任何一家的配方相似的亚甲基二膦酸亚锡(配体)试剂盒,以及正常溶解氧含量(RDO,6.7毫克O₂/升)或低溶解氧含量(LDO,3.8毫克O₂/升)的生理盐水,制备锝-99m亚甲基二膦酸盐(MDP)。将所得的锝-99m MDP剂量分别给予70例患者进行骨显像。A + RDO组合在骨图像中产生的胶片密度高于B + RDO组合(p小于0.05)。然而,使用LDO生理盐水复溶B可使骨图像密度提高到与A + RDO组合相当的水平。一位不知道所注射的具体溶解氧和配体组合的研究者判断,A + RDO的总体图像质量优于B + RDO(p小于0.05)或B + LDO(p小于0.01)。然而,在四种组合中,图像上的骨轮廓或软组织放射性均无差异(p大于或等于0.05)。图像密度测定显示,四种组合之间的软组织放射性也没有差异。在本研究条件下,产品A和B在临床性能上的主要差异仅受到用于复溶的生理盐水的氧含量的轻微影响。

相似文献

1
Effects of dissolved oxygen on Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate: concise communication.溶解氧对锝-99m亚甲基二膦酸盐的影响:简要通讯
J Nucl Med. 1981 Feb;22(2):153-6.
2
Tc-99m hydroxymethylene diphosphonate and Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate: biological and clinical comparison: concise communication.
J Nucl Med. 1983 Jun;24(6):463-6.
3
A comparison of bone imaging with Tc-99m DPD and Tc-99m MDP: concise communication.锝-99m二膦酸盐(Tc-99m DPD)与锝-99m亚甲基二膦酸盐(Tc-99m MDP)骨显像的比较:简要报告
J Nucl Med. 1982 Mar;23(3):214-7.
4
99mTc-hydroxymethane diphosphonate: a new bone imaging agent with a low tin content.99m锝-羟基甲烷二膦酸盐:一种低锡含量的新型骨显像剂。
Radiology. 1980 Jul;136(1):209-11. doi: 10.1148/radiology.136.1.6446106.
5
Technetium-99m-labeled methylene diphosphonate and hydroxyethylidine diphosphonate--biologic and clinical comparison: concise communication.
J Nucl Med. 1979 Aug;20(8):821-6.
6
[An experimental crossover study between hydroxymethylene diphosphonate kit and methylene diphosphonate (author's transl)].
Radioisotopes. 1982 Jan;31(1):32-4.
7
Electrophoretic analysis of different technetium-99m (SnCl2) methylene diphosphonate complexes.不同锝-99m(二氯化锡)亚甲基二膦酸盐配合物的电泳分析。
J Nucl Med. 1985 May;26(5):524-30.
8
Bone-seeking properties of Tc-99m carbonyl diphosphonic acid, dihydroxy-methylene diphosphonic acid and monohydroxy-methylene phosphoinic acid: concise communication.锝-99m羰基二膦酸、二羟基亚甲基二膦酸和单羟基亚甲基膦酸的亲骨特性:简要通讯
J Nucl Med. 1980 Aug;21(8):767-70.
9
Relative lesion detection ability of Tc-99m HMDP and Tc-99m MDP: concise communication.
J Nucl Med. 1984 Feb;25(2):166-9.
10
New diphosphonate compounds for skeletal imaging: comparison with methylene diphosphonate.用于骨骼成像的新型二膦酸盐化合物:与亚甲基二膦酸盐的比较。
Radiology. 1983 Dec;149(3):823-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.149.3.6316414.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing bone scan quality.
Eur J Nucl Med. 1983;8(10):436-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00252942.