Rao P S, Monarrez C N
J Electrocardiol. 1981;14(1):25-30. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(81)80025-8.
Increased terminal rightward forces manifested by S waves greater than the 95th percentile (95%) for age in the left chest leads of the ECG can be produced by right ventricular hypertrophy (RVH) and posterobasal left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). There are no currently available criteria to differentiate these. The S wave in lead V5 exceeded the 95% for age in 445 of 5,240 patients (8.5%). From these, the ECGs of patients with lesions known to produce "isolated" RVH (46 patients) or LVH (38 patients) were chosen for study. Analysis of these ECGs revealed two patterns in each group: 1. Voltage criteria for ventricular hypertrophy other than SV5 & SV6 were present in 26 patients of the RVH group and 15 of the LVH group; 2. The ECGs of the remaining 20 of the RVH and 23 of the LVH group contained no other voltage criteria to diagnose either RVH or LVH. These 43 ECGs were further analyzed. SV5, SV6 and RV5 were similar in both groups (p greater than 0.01). However, SI, R'V4R, R'V1 and the ratio RV2/SV2 were higher (p less than 0.01) and SV2 was lower (p less than 0.01) in the RVH group. Despite significant differences, there was marked overlap of the data. Therefore, discriminant analysis was performed which suggested RVH if SI greater than 5mm, RV2 greater than 10mm and the ratio RV2/SV2 greater than 0.65, and LVH if SI less than 5 mm, RV2 less than 10mm and the ratio RV2/SV2 less than 0.65. In the frontal plane the mean QRS vector was similar; however, in the horizontal plane, it varied between +60 degrees to +200 degrees in the RVH group and between -10 degrees to -130 degrees in the LVH group. The rotation of the QRS loop in the horizontal plane was clockwise (CW) or figure of eight in RVH group and counterclockwise (CCW) in the LVH group. The orthogonal vector data confirm these results. It is concluded that when SV5 is greater than 95% for age and there are no other clear voltage criteria for ventricular hypertrophy the diagnosis of RVH vs LVH may be made on the basis of the following: RVH: RV2 greater than 10mm, SI greater than 5mm and mean horizontal plane QRS vector between +60 degrees to +200 degrees with a CW or a figure of eight loop and LVH: RV2 less than 10mm, SI less than 5mm and mean horizontal plane QRS vector between -10 degrees to -130 degrees with CCW loop.
心电图左胸导联中S波大于年龄对应的第95百分位数(95%)所表现出的终末向右力量增加,可由右心室肥厚(RVH)和左心室后基底段肥厚(LVH)引起。目前尚无可用标准来区分这两者。在5240例患者中,有445例(8.5%)V5导联的S波超过年龄对应的95%。从中选取已知会产生“孤立性”RVH(46例)或LVH(38例)病变患者的心电图进行研究。对这些心电图的分析显示,每组有两种模式:1. RVH组26例患者和LVH组15例患者存在除SV5和SV6之外的心室肥厚电压标准;2. RVH组其余20例患者和LVH组23例患者的心电图不包含用于诊断RVH或LVH的其他电压标准。对这43份心电图进行了进一步分析。两组的SV5、SV6和RV5相似(p大于0.01)。然而,RVH组的SI、R'V4R、R'V1以及RV2/SV2比值更高(p小于0.01),而SV2更低(p小于0.01)。尽管存在显著差异,但数据有明显重叠。因此,进行了判别分析,提示如果SI大于5mm、RV2大于10mm且RV2/SV2比值大于0.65,则为RVH;如果SI小于5mm、RV2小于10mm且RV2/SV2比值小于0.65,则为LVH。在额面,平均QRS向量相似;然而,在水平面,RVH组在+60度至+200度之间变化,LVH组在 -10度至 -130度之间变化。RVH组水平面QRS环的旋转为顺时针(CW)或8字形,LVH组为逆时针(CCW)。正交向量数据证实了这些结果。结论是,当SV5大于年龄对应的95%且没有其他明确的心室肥厚电压标准时,RVH与LVH的诊断可基于以下依据:RVH:RV2大于10mm,SI大于5mm,平均水平面QRS向量在+60度至+200度之间,环为CW或8字形;LVH:RV2小于10mm,SI小于5mm,平均水平面QRS向量在 -10度至 -130度之间,环为CCW。