Wisely D W, Morgan S B
Am J Ment Defic. 1981 Nov;86(3):281-6.
Third- and sixth-grade children were shown slides and tapes presenting target children as either (a) physically nonhandicapped and nonretarded, (b) physically handicapped only, (c) mentally retarded only, or (d) physically handicapped and mentally retarded. All children were rated more favorably by third graders than sixth graders and more favorably by boys than girls. Physically handicapped target children were rated more favorably than were nonhandicapped children on behavioral intentions measures but were not rated differently on an attitude scale; retarded children were also rated more favorably than were nonretarded children on the former measures but less favorably on the attitude scale. Significant interactions were noted and implications of the results discussed.
研究人员向三年级和六年级的学生展示了幻灯片和录像带,其中呈现的目标儿童分为以下几种类型:(a)身体无残疾且无智力障碍;(b)仅身体有残疾;(c)仅智力有障碍;(d)身体有残疾且智力有障碍。在所有儿童中,三年级学生对目标儿童的评价比六年级学生更积极,男孩对目标儿童的评价比女孩更积极。在行为意向测量方面,身体有残疾的目标儿童比无残疾儿童得到了更积极的评价,但在态度量表上两者的评价没有差异;在行为意向测量方面,智力有障碍的儿童也比无智力障碍的儿童得到了更积极的评价,但在态度量表上前者的评价不如后者积极。研究发现了显著的交互作用,并对研究结果的意义进行了讨论。