Couch N P, Tilney N L, Moore F D
Am J Surg. 1978 May;135(5):641-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(78)90127-7.
Analysis revealed an impressive number of patients transferred to intensive care at the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital after misadventures in standard medical and surgical procedures. The model explored here is that of colon surgery, a therapy standardized for decades. The courses of sixteen patients were studied, wherein adverse outcomes appeared to have been preventable. Failure to diagnose colonic leakage and failure to provide colostomy (or to do so safely) were the major underlying causes. Nephrotoxic antibiotics and immunosuppression were sometimes in the background. Nine patients died, all with severe sepsis. Multiple organ failure occurred in the majority of cases. The mortality was tenfold, the cost sevenfold, and the length of hospitalization fourfold that expected after uneventful operation. Current interest in cost-benefit analysis should be broadened standard medical and surgical procedures. Litigious potential should not be allowed to impede such analyses.
分析显示,在彼得·本特·布里格姆医院,许多患者在标准医疗和外科手术中遭遇意外后被转入重症监护病房。此处探讨的模型是结肠手术,这是一种已标准化数十年的治疗方法。研究了16名患者的病程,其中不良后果似乎是可以预防的。未能诊断出结肠渗漏以及未能实施结肠造口术(或安全实施)是主要的潜在原因。肾毒性抗生素和免疫抑制有时也在其中起作用。9名患者死亡,均死于严重脓毒症。大多数病例发生了多器官功能衰竭。死亡率是正常手术预期的10倍,成本是7倍,住院时间是4倍。当前对成本效益分析的关注应扩大到标准医疗和外科手术。不应让诉讼可能性阻碍此类分析。