Appelman I B, Mayzner M S
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1982 Mar;111(1):60-100. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.111.1.60.
This article reviews studies in which a single letter is visually presented under adverse conditions and the subject's task is to identify the letter. The typical results for such studies are (a) certain pairs of letters are more often confused than other pairs of letters; (b) certain letters are more easily recognized than others; and (c) confusion errors for a letter pair are often asymmetric, the number of errors differing depending on which letter of the pair is presented as the stimulus. A geometric model incorporating the properties of distance and spatial density (after Krumhansl) is presented to account for these results. The present application of the distance-density model assumes that each letter is constructed in a typical 5 X 7 dot matrix. Each letter is represented in 35-dimensional space based on its constituent dots. A central idea behind the model, embodied in the property of spatial density, is that an explanation of typical results must take into account the relationship of the entire stimulus set to both the presented letter and the responded letter. Specifically, according to the model, (a) pairs of letters that are close in geometric space are more often confused than pairs of letters that are distant; (b) letters that are in less spatially dense regions are more easily recognized than letters that are in more spatially dense regions; and (c) asymmetric confusion errors result when one member of a letter pair is in a denser region than the other member of the letter pair. The distance-density model is applied to published and unpublished results of the authors as well as published results from two other laboratories. Alternative explanations of the three typical letter recognition results are also considered. The most successful alternative explanations are (a) confusions are an increasing function of the number of dots that two letters share; (b) letters constructed from fewer dots are easier to recognize; and (c) asymmetries arise when one member of a letter pair is more easily recognized, since that letter then has fewer confusion errors to give to the other letter of the pair. The model is discussed in terms of the distinction between template matching and feature analysis. An alternative classification of letter recognition models is proposed based on the global versus local qualities of features and the spatial information associated with each feature. The model is extended to explain reaction time study results. It is suggested that the distance-density model can be used to create optimal letter fonts by minimizing interletter confusions and maximizing letter recognizability.
本文回顾了一些研究,这些研究中单个字母在不利条件下以视觉方式呈现,而受试者的任务是识别该字母。此类研究的典型结果是:(a)某些字母对比其他字母对更容易混淆;(b)某些字母比其他字母更容易识别;(c)字母对的混淆错误通常是不对称的,错误数量取决于作为刺激呈现的字母对中的哪一个字母。提出了一个包含距离和空间密度属性的几何模型(基于克鲁姆汉斯尔的模型)来解释这些结果。距离 - 密度模型的当前应用假设每个字母是在典型的5×7点阵中构建的。每个字母基于其组成的点在35维空间中表示。该模型背后的一个核心思想体现在空间密度属性中,即对典型结果的解释必须考虑整个刺激集与呈现字母和响应字母之间的关系。具体而言,根据该模型,(a)在几何空间中距离较近的字母对比距离较远的字母对更容易混淆;(b)位于空间密度较小区域的字母比位于空间密度较大区域的字母更容易识别;(c)当字母对中的一个成员比另一个成员位于更密集的区域时,就会产生不对称的混淆错误。距离 - 密度模型被应用于作者已发表和未发表的结果以及其他两个实验室已发表的结果。还考虑了对这三个典型字母识别结果的其他解释。最成功的其他解释是:(a)混淆是两个字母共享的点数的递增函数;(b)由较少点数构建的字母更容易识别;(c)当字母对中的一个成员更容易识别时会出现不对称,因为该字母然后对该字母对中的另一个字母产生的混淆错误较少。从模板匹配和特征分析的区别角度对该模型进行了讨论。基于特征的全局与局部性质以及与每个特征相关的空间信息,提出了字母识别模型的另一种分类方法。该模型被扩展以解释反应时间研究结果。有人建议,距离 - 密度模型可用于通过最小化字母间的混淆并最大化字母的可识别性来创建最佳字母字体。