Koopman J P, Mullink J W, Prins R A, Welling G W, Hectors M P
Lab Anim. 1982 Jan;16(1):59-64. doi: 10.1258/002367782780908724.
A cultured microflora obtained from the caecum of a "normal" mouse was given to 4 groups of germfree mice and was supplied 1x, 2x, 3x and 4x respectively at 5-day intervals. Another group received a 10(-7) dilution of the caecal flora while a group associated with an 'SPF' flora served as control. The difference (measured by 8 parameters) between mice supplied with the cultured flora or with a 10(-7) dilution, both given once only, was small. Supplying the flora 3x resulted in more 'normal' mice compared with mice which received the flora once or twice. The caeca of specified-pathogen-free mice contained more bacteria per gram (microscopic bacterial count), less aerobic and anaerobic bacteria per gram (viable counts), while the yield as percentage of the microscopic bacterial count was lower as compared with the group to which a cultured flora was supplied 4 times.
从“正常”小鼠盲肠中获取的培养微生物群落被给予4组无菌小鼠,并分别以5天的间隔供应1倍、2倍、3倍和4倍剂量。另一组接受盲肠菌群的10^(-7)稀释液,而一组与“无特定病原体”(SPF)菌群相关联的小鼠作为对照。仅一次性给予培养菌群或10^(-7)稀释液的小鼠之间的差异(通过8个参数测量)很小。与接受一次或两次菌群的小鼠相比,供应3倍剂量菌群产生了更多“正常”的小鼠。无特定病原体小鼠的盲肠每克含有更多细菌(显微镜下细菌计数),每克需氧菌和厌氧菌更少(活菌计数),而与接受4次培养菌群的组相比,作为显微镜下细菌计数百分比的产量更低。