Geraads A, Pirotte C, Ligeonnet D, Levy P, Brambilla C
Rev Mal Respir. 1984;1(2):119-24.
A study was made of pulmonary artery pressure in 16 chronic bronchitics with severe respiratory failure, who were treated with continuous oxygen therapy at home. At the beginning of the study these patients presented with a pure and severe obstructive syndrome with marked hypoxaemia at rest (mean PaO2 = 6.8 kPa), had a suitable interval from a recent exacerbation, in a stable clinical and functional respiratory state. The duration of longterm oxygen therapy was controlled, as the efficacy of the blood gases (PaO2 of O2 greater than or equal to 8 kPa). The pulmonary artery pressure was measured using a microcatheter, at the beginning, and for most of the 18 months breathing ambient air in a stable state. At the end of this time a significant diminution of the FEV1 (VEMS) (a mean of 100 ml, p less than 0.01). This was evidence of the deterioration in the ventilatory state which contrasted with the improvement in the diminution of pulmonary artery hypertension (HTAP) from 3.43 to 2.97 kPa (p less than 0.05) without the deterioration in the other values. The good result above in chronic bronchitics contrasts with a stable or deteriorating pulmonary arterial pressure in a group of emphysematous (n = 6) and bronchiectatic subjects (n = 4) with somewhat similar functional characteristics but in whom the effect was too small to allow for any statistical comparison. Our results are compared with those in the literature much of which applies to only a few patients and for the great part revealed only haemodynamic stability of oxygen therapy. Possible reasons for these discordant findings are discussed.
对16例在家接受持续氧疗的重度呼吸衰竭慢性支气管炎患者的肺动脉压进行了研究。在研究开始时,这些患者表现为单纯且严重的阻塞性综合征,静息时存在明显低氧血症(平均动脉血氧分压=6.8千帕),距近期病情加重有适当间隔,处于稳定的临床和呼吸功能状态。长期氧疗的持续时间得到控制,以血气(动脉血氧分压大于或等于8千帕)的疗效为依据。使用微导管在开始时以及在稳定状态下呼吸环境空气的18个月中的大部分时间测量肺动脉压。在这段时间结束时,第一秒用力呼气容积(VEMS)显著降低(平均降低100毫升,p<0.01)。这证明通气状态恶化,这与肺动脉高压(HTAP)从3.43千帕降至2.97千帕的改善形成对比(p<0.05),而其他值没有恶化。慢性支气管炎患者上述良好结果与一组具有相似功能特征但效果太小无法进行任何统计学比较的肺气肿患者(n=6)和支气管扩张患者(n=4)中稳定或恶化的肺动脉压形成对比。我们的结果与文献中的结果进行了比较,文献中的大部分研究仅涉及少数患者,并且在很大程度上仅显示了氧疗的血液动力学稳定性。讨论了这些不一致发现的可能原因。