Dioptron Nova验光数据与传统验光数据的比较。

Comparison of Dioptron Nova refractive data with conventional refractive data.

作者信息

Perrigin D M, Grosvenor T, Reis A, Perrigin J

出版信息

Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984 Jul;61(7):479-83. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198407000-00010.

DOI:10.1097/00006324-198407000-00010

Abstract

Refractive data obtained by means of the Dioptron Nova Diagnostic Eye Computer were compared to data obtained by conventional clinical refraction on a group of 236 clinic patients. Spherical equivalent power data were found to average -0.32 D more for Dioptron Nova data than for clinical data, whereas spherical power data averaged -0.25 D more for Dioptron Nova data than for clinical data, and cylinder power averaged -0.12 D more for Dioptron Nova data. Dioptron and clinical data were found to be within +/- 0.50 D of each other for 74% of eyes for spherical equivalent power, for 83% of eyes for spherical power, and for 91% of eyes for cylinder power. Cylinder axis data were found to be within +/- 10 degrees for the two methods for 78% of eyes.

摘要

将通过Dioptron Nova诊断眼科计算机获得的屈光数据与一组236名临床患者通过传统临床验光获得的数据进行比较。发现Dioptron Nova数据的等效球镜度数据比临床数据平均高-0.32D，而Dioptron Nova数据的球镜度数据比临床数据平均高-0.25D，柱镜度数据Dioptron Nova数据平均高-0.12D。对于等效球镜度，74%的眼睛的Dioptron数据和临床数据在彼此±0.50D范围内；对于球镜度，83%的眼睛如此；对于柱镜度，91%的眼睛如此。对于78%的眼睛，两种方法的柱镜轴数据在±10度范围内。