[Relationships between refractive parameters: sphere, cylinder and axis].

PURPOSE

To analyze the relationships between refractive parameters as well as the relationship between fellow eyes in a normal population.

METHODS

Both subjective refraction and auto-refractometry data of 500 patients were prospectively recorded. Refraction data were analyzed on three rectangular coordinates in a dioptric space. WTR/ATR ratio of axis was quantified by the Cos2axis function. Enantiomorphism (mirror-image symmetry) between fellow eye axes was quantified by the absolute value of the difference between 180° and the sum of both axes.

RESULTS

Mean refraction and mean cylinder were -1.74D (+0.28D × 91.5°) and 0.81 ± 0.89D respectively. The spherical component had no significant influence on refractive astigmatism (r(s)≤ 0.07, P ≥ 0.07) except for high spherical ametropia. Eyes with spherical equivalent greater than 4D (in absolute value) demonstrated higher cylinder (1.15D vs 0.84D, P<0.001). Cylinder influenced the WTR/ATR ratio (r(s)=-0.25, P<0.001) and the enantiomorphism (r(s)=0.36, P<0.001). Age also influenced the WTR/ATR ratio (r(s)=0.27, P<0.001) and the enantiomorphism (r(s)=0.14, P<0.001). Axes were more likely WTR and enantiomorphic when the cylinder was high and the subject young. Oblique axes were less enantiomorphic (35.5° vs 20.6°, P<0.001) and were associated with lower cylinder (0.56D vs 0.98D, P<0.001). Correlation between fellow eyes was significant for cylinder (r(s)=0.66, P<0.001) and for spherical equivalent (r(s)=0.96, P<0.001). Gender had no significant influence on refraction (P>0.12) except for spherical equivalent (relative hyperopia of +0.17D, P=0.04 in females).

CONCLUSION

The spherical component of the refraction appears to be independent of the refractive astigmatism except for high spherical ametropia. Cylinder influences somewhat the WTR/ATR ratio of axis and the enantiomorphism. Relationships between refractive parameters are weak in comparison to the fellow eye relationships.