Baruffi G, Dellinger W S, Stobino D M, Rudolph A, Timmons R Y, Ross A
Am J Public Health. 1984 Sep;74(9):973-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.9.973.
This study compares 796 pregnancy outcomes at a maternity center (BMC) with 804 hospital (TJUH) pregnancy outcomes. The samples of pregnant women from the participating institutions were matched on sociodemographic characteristics; analysis of outcomes was performed controlling for medical-obstetric risk. Differences between the institutions were found mainly among women with low intrapartum risk. For these women, neonatal morbidity and length of infant nursery stay were lower at BMC than at TJUH. The percentage of infants with one-minute Apgar scores less than 7 or requiring resuscitation at birth was greater at BMC, but the percentage of infants with five-minute Apgar scores less than 7 as well as neonatal mortality rates did not differ between the two institutions. The number of women with intrapartum or postpartum fever was too small to permit comparison. The study results suggest that care delivered at BMC is safe with regard to the evaluative criteria used.
本研究将一家妇产中心(BMC)的796例妊娠结局与一家医院(TJUH)的804例妊娠结局进行了比较。来自参与机构的孕妇样本在社会人口学特征方面进行了匹配;对结局进行分析时控制了医疗产科风险。机构之间的差异主要存在于产时风险较低的女性中。对于这些女性,BMC的新生儿发病率和婴儿在新生儿重症监护室的住院时间低于TJUH。出生时1分钟阿氏评分低于7分或需要复苏的婴儿比例在BMC更高,但出生时5分钟阿氏评分低于7分的婴儿比例以及两家机构的新生儿死亡率并无差异。产时或产后发热的女性数量过少,无法进行比较。研究结果表明,就所使用的评估标准而言,BMC提供的护理是安全的。