The midwife dossier: cooperation or competition?
作者信息
Klein M C
出版信息
CMAJ. 1994 Mar 1;150(5):657-61.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The midwife dossier: cooperation or competition?助产士档案：合作还是竞争？
CMAJ. 1994 Mar 1;150(5):657-61.
2
Midwifery defined by physicians, nurses and midwives: the birth of a consensus?医生、护士和助产士对助产的定义：共识的诞生？
CMAJ. 1994 Mar 1;150(5):691-7.
3
Blame and vindication in the early modern birthing chamber.近代早期产房中的指责与辩护。
Med Hist. 2006 Oct;50(4):447-64.
4
[The evolution of midwifery].[助产术的演变]
Harefuah. 2007 May;146(5):380-4, 405.
5
[Integral obstetrics impeded by history? Midwives and gynaecologists through the ages].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2016;160:D621.
6
The campaign to eliminate the midwife.消灭助产士的运动。
Am J Nurs. 2000 Oct;100(10):50-6.
7
Despite CMA misgivings, support for midwifery appears to be growing.尽管美国儿科学会有所顾虑，但对助产术的支持似乎在不断增加。
CMAJ. 1988 Oct 15;139(8):769-72.
8
The American midwife controversy: a crisis of professsionalization.美国助产士争议：职业化危机
Bull Hist Med. 1966 Jul-Aug;40(4):350-63.
9
10
An Australian history of the subordination of midwifery.澳大利亚助产术从属地位的历史。
Women Birth. 2007 Mar;20(1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Sep 14.
本文引用的文献
1
The effectiveness of family practice maternity care. A cross-cultural and environmental view.家庭医疗产科护理的有效性。跨文化与环境视角。
Prim Care. 1993 Sep;20(3):523-36.
2
A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant) and integrated general practice unit. I. Obstetrical procedures and neonatal outcome.在两种护理体系（共享护理（顾问医生模式）和综合全科医疗单元）中登记分娩的低风险孕妇的比较。I. 产科手术及新生儿结局。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Feb;90(2):118-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08894.x.
3
Childbirth management and medical monopoly: midwifery as (almost) a profession.分娩管理与医学垄断：助产术（几乎）成为一门职业
J Nurse Midwifery. 1984 Sep-Oct;29(5):300-6. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(84)90240-4.
4
A study of pregnancy outcomes in a maternity center and a tertiary care hospital.一项关于妇产中心和三级护理医院妊娠结局的研究。
Am J Public Health. 1984 Sep;74(9):973-8. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.9.973.
5
Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980.会阴切开术的益处与风险：对1860年至1980年英文文献的解释性综述
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1983 Jun;38(6):322-38.
6
Low-risk obstetric care for low-risk mothers.
Lancet. 1980 May 10;1(8176):1017-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91449-x.
7
The influence of the high-risk care environment on the practice of low-risk obstetrics.高风险护理环境对低风险产科实践的影响。
Fam Med. 1991 Mar-Apr;23(3):184-8.
Zotero 插件