Böcking A, Auffermann W, Schwarz H, Bammert J, Dörrjer G, Vucicuja S
Anal Quant Cytol. 1984 Jun;6(2):74-88.
The validity of diagnostic criteria for the cytologic differentiation between benign and malignant cases and between normal (hyperplastic) and inflammation-activated (prostatitis) prostatic cells was tested by means of semiautomated image analysis and cytophotometry. The following criteria were found to have significant differences between benign and malignant prostatic cells: nucleoli (number, size and size variability), regularity of nuclear arrangement, anisonucleosis, nuclear size, nuclear polymorphism and dissociation of cells. The following criteria were found to be invalid for the detection of prostatic cancer cells: nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio, hyperchromasia and anisochromasia. the cytologic diagnosis of prostatic cancer was achieved by observing a variable constellation of at least three of six pathognomically altered diagnostic criteria. No fixed pattern of diagnostic criteria was found either for prostatic cancer cells in general or for the different malignancy grades.
通过半自动图像分析和细胞光度测定法,对良性和恶性病例之间以及正常(增生性)和炎症激活(前列腺炎)前列腺细胞之间的细胞学分化诊断标准的有效性进行了测试。发现以下标准在良性和恶性前列腺细胞之间存在显著差异:核仁(数量、大小和大小变异性)、核排列规则性、核大小不均、核大小、核多形性和细胞解离。发现以下标准对前列腺癌细胞的检测无效:核质比、核深染和核色不均。通过观察六种具有病理特征改变的诊断标准中至少三种的可变组合,实现了前列腺癌的细胞学诊断。无论是一般的前列腺癌细胞还是不同恶性等级的癌细胞,均未发现固定的诊断标准模式。