• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全髋关节置换术中前外侧、经转子和后侧入路后异位骨的比较。

Comparison of heterotopic bone after anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty.

作者信息

Morrey B F, Adams R A, Cabanela M E

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Sep(188):160-7.

PMID:6467711
Abstract

The effects of anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty on heterotopic bone formation were studied in 507 consecutive patients with osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis who had not had previous hip surgery. Range of motion, degree of pain, and satisfaction were compared. Although the lowest incidence of ectopic ossification occurred after the posterior approach, there were no statistically significant differences among the three approaches. Extensive ectopic bone, involving more than half the distance between the trochanter and acetabulum, occurred in 29% after anterolateral, 28% after lateral transtrochanteric, and 22% after posterior approaches. Motion was most affected by the lateral approach, whereas relief of pain and general satisfaction were slightly better with the posterior approach. Multivariate statistical analysis suggests that the difference in results (p less than 0.05) with the posterior approach is primarily due to a relatively lower incidence of severe grades of heterotopic bone.

摘要

对507例未曾接受过髋关节手术的骨关节炎或缺血性坏死患者进行了研究,比较前外侧、经转子和后侧手术入路全髋关节置换术对异位骨形成的影响。比较了活动范围、疼痛程度和满意度。虽然后侧入路后异位骨化的发生率最低,但三种入路之间无统计学显著差异。广泛异位骨(累及转子与髋臼之间距离的一半以上)在前外侧入路后发生率为29%,经转子外侧入路后为28%,后侧入路后为22%。活动受外侧入路影响最大,而后侧入路在缓解疼痛和总体满意度方面略好。多变量统计分析表明,后侧入路结果的差异(p小于0.05)主要是由于严重程度的异位骨发生率相对较低。

相似文献

1
Comparison of heterotopic bone after anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中前外侧、经转子和后侧入路后异位骨的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Sep(188):160-7.
2
A comparison of the anterolateral, transtrochanteric, and posterior surgical approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty.初次全髋关节置换术中前外侧、经大转子和后入路手术方式的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Sep(188):152-9.
3
Heterotopic ossification after direct lateral approach and transtrochanteric approach to the hip.髋关节直接外侧入路和经转子入路术后的异位骨化
Orthop Rev. 1988 Oct;17(10):965-71.
4
A comparison of osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis patients following total hip arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up study.全髋关节置换术后骨坏死与骨关节炎患者的比较:一项长期随访研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 May(206):139-46.
5
Incidence of heterotopic ossification after total hip replacement: effect of the type of fixation of the femoral component.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Feb;73(2):191-3.
6
Heterotopic ossification in total hip arthroplasty. The influence of the approach.全髋关节置换术中的异位骨化。手术入路的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 1994 Apr;9(2):199-202. doi: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90069-8.
7
Heterotopic bone in hip arthroplasties. Cemented versus noncemented.髋关节置换术中的异位骨。骨水泥型与非骨水泥型。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Sep(282):145-53.
8
Heterotopic ossification after primary cemented and noncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者初次骨水泥型和非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术后的异位骨化
Can J Surg. 1994 Apr;37(2):135-9.
9
Comparison of complications in transtrochanteric and anterolateral approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty.
Orthopedics. 2008 Nov;31(11):1085. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20081101-04.
10
Ectopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty. Predisposing factors, frequency, and effect on results.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977 Apr;59(3):345-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of ibuprofen and indomethacin as prophylaxis of heterotopic ossification: a comparative study.布洛芬和吲哚美辛预防异位骨化的疗效:一项比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 18;13(1):20210. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47508-8.
2
Acetabular Reaming Is a Reliable Model to Produce and Characterize Periarticular Heterotopic Ossification of the Hip.髋臼锉磨是一种可靠的模型,可用于产生和表征髋关节周围异位骨化。
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2022 Aug 23;11(8):876-888. doi: 10.1093/stcltm/szac042.
3
Heterotopic ossification in primary total hip arthroplasty using the posterolateral compared to the direct lateral approach.
初次全髋关节置换术中应用后外侧入路与直接外侧入路的异位骨化比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Jul;141(7):1253-1259. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03783-6. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
4
Results after arthroscopic treatment of iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty.关节镜治疗全髋关节置换术后髂腰肌撞击综合征的疗效。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Feb;142(2):189-195. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03623-z. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
5
Early results of displaced femoral neck fragility fractures treated with supercapsular percutaneous-assisted total hip arthroplasty.经皮辅助囊上全髋关节置换术治疗移位型股骨颈脆性骨折的早期结果
Arthroplast Today. 2019 Mar 16;5(2):193-196. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2019.02.003. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
Trauma-Induced Heterotopic Ossification Regulates the Blood-Nerve Barrier.创伤诱导的异位骨化调节血神经屏障。
Front Neurol. 2018 Jun 5;9:408. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00408. eCollection 2018.
7
Ossifications in Albright Hereditary Osteodystrophy: Role of Genotype, Inheritance, Sex, Age, Hormonal Status, and BMI.奥尔布赖特遗传性骨营养不良中的骨化:基因型、遗传方式、性别、年龄、激素状态和 BMI 的作用。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jan 1;103(1):158-168. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00860.
8
Heterotopic ossification after hip arthroscopy.髋关节镜检查术后的异位骨化
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015 Aug 28;2(4):355-63. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnv052. eCollection 2015 Dec.
9
Incidence of heterotopic ossification in direct anterior vs posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective radiographic review.全髋关节置换术直接前路与后路入路异位骨化的发生率:一项回顾性影像学研究
Int Orthop. 2016 Sep;40(9):1967-73. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3048-4. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
10
Heterotopic ossification following hip arthroplasty: a comparative radiographic study about its development with the use of three different kinds of implants.髋关节置换术后的异位骨化:一项关于使用三种不同类型植入物时其发展情况的比较影像学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2015 Nov 14;10:176. doi: 10.1186/s13018-015-0317-2.