Kaisen A, Kjetså G A, Lie R K, Hjetland R, Haaland P T, Møller P, Oulie H E, Tveit T, Maeland J G
Med Educ. 1984 Sep;18(5):349-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1984.tb01281.x.
A total of 168 interns who have graduated from the Medical Schools of Bergen and Tromsø were asked about various aspects of the medical curriculum. In Bergen the curriculum has a traditional structure with a pre-clinical and a clinical part, but in Tromsø the pre-clinical and clinical subjects are integrated. In addition, the students in Tromsø spend long periods in municipal hospitals and in the primary health care service. We were interested in how the interns from the two universities evaluated their respective curricula and how prepared they felt for their current work. There was a response rate of 86% to the questionnaire. The results showed that the interns from Tromsø are more satisfied with their education and feel more confident in their practical skills than the interns from Bergen. They are also more motivated for future work in general practice. In our opinion the main reason for these results is the difference in curricula in the two medical schools. Other possible reasons are also discussed.
共有168名毕业于卑尔根和特罗姆瑟医学院的实习生被问及医学课程的各个方面。在卑尔根,课程采用传统结构,分为临床前和临床部分,但在特罗姆瑟,临床前和临床科目是整合在一起的。此外,特罗姆瑟的学生在市立医院和初级卫生保健服务机构实习很长时间。我们感兴趣的是,这两所大学的实习生如何评价各自的课程,以及他们对目前工作的准备程度如何。问卷的回复率为86%。结果显示,与卑尔根的实习生相比,特罗姆瑟的实习生对自己的教育更满意,对实际技能更有信心。他们对未来从事全科医疗工作也更有积极性。我们认为,这些结果的主要原因是两所医学院课程的差异。还讨论了其他可能的原因。