Oyekan A O, Laniyonu A A
Trop Geogr Med. 1984 Jun;36(2):193-9.
The effects of cow's urine concoction (CUPR) and of the concoction in distilled water (CUPRw) were assessed on convulsion and the effects of each of the constituents in cow's urine or distilled water was also assessed. The basic procedure involved was observing for convulsion, the time of its occurrence and its duration, and time for recovery or death following the administration of the concoction and each of its constituents in distilled water or cow's urine. The results showed that the CUPR paradoxically induced convulsion while the CUPRw did not. Of the individual constituents (in either medium) tobacco gave appreciable results on the convulsion, thus suggesting that it is the active ingredient. In instances where convulsion was recorded, its onset and duration followed with or without death, is a function of the dose employed. The administration of cow's urine and some of the constituents alone produced no remarkable results, though when given in randomized combination some significant findings were recorded. It is suggested that the possibility of interaction between the various constituents is high and that there is a differential solubilization of the constituents in the media, thus bringing about qualitative and quantitative differences in the observations. The claim by the herbalists that the concoction is effective in eliminating convulsions is questionable as we observed that the concoction obtained from three different herbalists did not protect against strychnine-induced convulsion.
评估了牛尿混合物(CUPR)以及其在蒸馏水中的混合物(CUPRw)对惊厥的影响,同时也评估了牛尿或蒸馏水中各成分的影响。所采用的基本程序是,在给予混合物及其在蒸馏水或牛尿中的各成分后,观察是否出现惊厥、惊厥发生的时间及其持续时间,以及恢复或死亡的时间。结果显示,CUPR反常地诱发了惊厥,而CUPRw则没有。在各单一成分(在任何一种介质中)中,烟草对惊厥产生了明显的影响,因此表明它是活性成分。在记录到惊厥的情况下,惊厥的发作和持续时间(无论有无死亡)是所用剂量的函数。单独给予牛尿和一些成分没有产生显著结果,不过当以随机组合给予时,记录到了一些重要发现。提示各种成分之间相互作用的可能性很高,并且各成分在介质中的溶解情况不同,从而导致观察结果在定性和定量方面存在差异。草药医生声称该混合物对消除惊厥有效,这一说法值得怀疑,因为我们观察到从三位不同草药医生处获得的混合物并不能预防士的宁诱发的惊厥。