• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无名骨中心部分的判别函数分析

Discriminant function analysis of the central portion of the innominate.

作者信息

Taylor J V, DiBennardo R

出版信息

Am J Phys Anthropol. 1984 Jul;64(3):315-20. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330640314.

DOI:10.1002/ajpa.1330640314
PMID:6476103
Abstract

Terry Collection innominates of 260 American whites and blacks (65 males and 65 females of each race) were analyzed by discriminant function analysis for sex assessment, race known, and for simultaneous race and sex assessment. Measurements from the preservationally favored central portion of the innominate were chosen for their potential usefulness in forensic casework and to objectify long-recognized "formal" differences between the sexes in the greater sciatic notch. These included acetabular diameter, greater sciatic notch height, and position of greatest notch depth. Accuracy of sex prediction when race is known is roughly 90% in both the base sample of 260 and a test sample of 200 (50 additional individuals for each group). For simultaneous race and sex assessment, accuracy of prediction is roughly 60% for each group in both samples. This represents about a 45% reduction in error over random assignment by race and sex.

摘要

对260名美国白人和黑人(每个种族65名男性和65名女性)的无名骨进行了特里收集分析,通过判别函数分析进行性别评估(已知种族)以及同时进行种族和性别评估。选择无名骨保存良好的中央部分进行测量,因为它们在法医案件工作中可能有用,并且可以客观化长期以来人们所认识到的男女在坐骨大切迹方面的“形态”差异。这些测量包括髋臼直径、坐骨大切迹高度以及切迹最深位置。在已知种族的情况下,在260人的基础样本和200人的测试样本(每组额外增加50人)中,性别预测的准确率在两个种族中都约为90%。对于同时进行种族和性别评估,在两个样本中每个组的预测准确率约为60%。这意味着与按种族和性别随机分配相比,误差减少了约45%。

相似文献

1
Discriminant function analysis of the central portion of the innominate.无名骨中心部分的判别函数分析
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1984 Jul;64(3):315-20. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330640314.
2
Multiple discriminant function analysis of sex and race in the postcranial skeleton.
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1983 Jul;61(3):305-14. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330610305.
3
Discriminant function sexing of the tibia.
J Forensic Sci. 1984 Oct;29(4):1087-93.
4
Determination of sex of white femora by discriminant function analysis: forensic science applications.通过判别函数分析确定白色股骨的性别:法医学应用
J Forensic Sci. 1982 Apr;27(2):417-23.
5
Metric analysis of sex differences in South African black and white pelves.南非黑种人和白种人骨盆性别差异的计量分析。
Forensic Sci Int. 2005 Jan 29;147(2-3):119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.09.074.
6
Substantia innominata projection to caudate nucleus in macaque monkeys.
Brain Res. 1984 Jun 4;302(1):184-9. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91299-x.
7
SEX DETERMINATION BY DISCRIMINANT FUNCTION ANALYSIS OF THE MANDIBLE.通过下颌骨判别函数分析进行性别判定
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1964 Jun;22(2):129-35. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330220212.
8
Sexually dimorphic pelvic morphology in South African whites and blacks.南非白人和黑人的两性骨盆形态差异
Homo. 2003;53(3):255-62. doi: 10.1078/0018-442x-00049.
9
Univariate and multivariate methods for sexing the sacrum.用于骶骨性别鉴定的单变量和多变量方法。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1978 Jul;49(1):103-10. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330490116.
10
Sex determination with the head of the radius.用桡骨头进行性别鉴定。
J Forensic Sci. 1989 Sep;34(5):1206-13.

引用本文的文献

1
Population affinity estimation in forensic anthropology: a South African perspective.法医人类学中的人群亲缘关系估计:南非视角
Int J Legal Med. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1007/s00414-025-03529-8.
2
A statistical evaluation of the sexual dimorphism of the acetabulum in an Iberian population.伊比利亚人群髋臼性二态性的统计学评估。
Int J Legal Med. 2025 Jan;139(1):393-409. doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03334-9. Epub 2024 Sep 27.