Granger D N, Barrowman J A, Harper S L, Kvietys P R, Korthuis R J
Am J Physiol. 1984 Sep;247(3 Pt 1):G279-83. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1984.247.3.G279.
Sympathetic nerve stimulation is generally considered not to alter intestinal capillary pressure or filtration rate because of appropriate adjustments in the pre-to-postcapillary resistance ratio. To directly assess this possibility, we measured lymph flow, capillary pressure, capillary filtration coefficient, and the transcapillary oncotic pressure gradient in the cat small intestine. Measurements were taken under control conditions and during the steady-state phase of periarterial nerve stimulation, i.e., following completion of the escape phase. Venous outflow pressure was held constant (0 mmHg) during the entire experiment. Nerve stimulation resulted in a significant reduction of lymph flow (by 65%), capillary filtration coefficient (by 75%), and capillary pressure (by 15%). Interstitial fluid pressure, calculated from the measured parameters in the Starling equation, was also reduced (from -0.74 to -2.53 mmHg) by nerve stimulation. The results of this study indicate that intestinal capillary pressure and capillary filtration rate are not "autoregulated" during sympathetic nerve stimulation. Capillary derecruitment appears to be largely responsible for the dramatic reduction in filtration rate associated with adrenergic stimulation.
由于毛细血管前阻力与后阻力比值的适当调整,交感神经刺激通常被认为不会改变肠毛细血管压力或滤过率。为了直接评估这种可能性,我们测量了猫小肠的淋巴流量、毛细血管压力、毛细血管滤过系数和跨毛细血管胶体渗透压梯度。测量在对照条件下以及动脉周围神经刺激的稳态阶段进行,即在逃逸阶段结束后。在整个实验过程中,静脉流出压力保持恒定(0 mmHg)。神经刺激导致淋巴流量显著减少(减少65%)、毛细血管滤过系数显著减少(减少75%)以及毛细血管压力显著减少(减少15%)。根据斯塔林方程中测量参数计算得出的组织液压力,也因神经刺激而降低(从-0.74 mmHg降至-2.53 mmHg)。本研究结果表明,在交感神经刺激期间,肠毛细血管压力和毛细血管滤过率并非“自动调节”。毛细血管关闭似乎在很大程度上导致了与肾上腺素能刺激相关的滤过率急剧下降。