Sturm J T, Perry J F, Olson F R, Cicero J J
Ann Emerg Med. 1984 Oct;13(10):876-8. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(84)80659-9.
The records of 50 patients with traumatic aortic rupture (Group I) and 50 patients with blunt chest trauma but negative aortograms (Group II) were reviewed retrospectively. Symptoms and signs referable to the chest and thoracic aorta were recorded and compared in Group I and Group II patients. Each patient's chart was evaluated for chest pain, respiratory distress, thoracic back pain, hypotension, hypertension, and decreased femoral pulses. None of the symptoms or signs attained statistical significance between Group I and Group II patients. The only significant difference between Group I and Group II patients was in the injury severity score (ISS). The mean ISS for aortic rupture patients was 42.1 +/- 11.6 (SD), but was only 19.9 +/- 11.4 (SD) (P less than .001) for patients without aortic rupture. We conclude that the diagnosis of aortic rupture in patients sustaining blunt chest trauma cannot be accurately predicted or excluded on the basis of the patients' presenting complaints or physical findings.
回顾性分析了50例创伤性主动脉破裂患者(第一组)和50例钝性胸部创伤但主动脉造影阴性患者(第二组)的病历。记录并比较了第一组和第二组患者与胸部及胸主动脉相关的症状和体征。评估了每位患者病历中的胸痛、呼吸窘迫、胸背部疼痛、低血压、高血压及股动脉搏动减弱情况。第一组和第二组患者之间的任何症状或体征均未达到统计学显著性差异。第一组和第二组患者之间唯一的显著差异在于损伤严重度评分(ISS)。主动脉破裂患者的平均ISS为42.1±11.6(标准差),而无主动脉破裂患者的平均ISS仅为19.9±11.4(标准差)(P<0.001)。我们得出结论,钝性胸部创伤患者的主动脉破裂诊断不能基于患者的主诉或体格检查结果准确预测或排除。