Eschenbacher W L, Bethel R A, Boushey H A, Sheppard D
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984 Sep;130(3):363-7. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1984.130.3.363.
To determine whether morphine sulfate alters the bronchoconstrictive response to inhalation of distilled water, we gave 13 subjects with mild asthma 0.15 mg/kg morphine sulfate or normal saline intravenously, after which they inhaled increasing volumes of nebulized distilled water from an ultrasonic nebulizer. We constructed stimulus-response curves, and by interpolation determined the provocative output of the nebulizer that resulted in a 50% increase in SRaw from baseline (PO50). On a separate day the subjects inhaled 2.0 mg of atropine sulfate 30 min before they inhaled distilled water. We compared the bronchoconstrictive response after morphine and after atropine with the bronchoconstrictive response after saline by determining the ratio of the PO50 values. Atropine was considered effective in inhibiting bronchoconstriction in 7 of the 13 subjects in whom the ratio of PO50 after atropine to the PO50 after saline was greater than 2.0. By similar criteria, morphine was also considered effective in 5 of these 7 subjects. Neither atropine nor morphine was effective in the remaining 6 subjects. By chi-square analysis, we found a positive correlation between the inhibitory effects of morphine and those of atropine (p less than 0.05). In the 5 subjects in whom morphine was effective, naloxone reversed the inhibitory effect of morphine. Atropine caused significant baseline bronchodilation when compared with placebo (normal saline), whereas morphine did not. We conclude that opiate receptor stimulation by morphine causes inhibition of the vagally mediated component of water-induced bronchoconstriction.
为了确定硫酸吗啡是否会改变对吸入蒸馏水的支气管收缩反应,我们给13名轻度哮喘患者静脉注射0.15mg/kg硫酸吗啡或生理盐水,之后他们通过超声雾化器吸入逐渐增加体积的雾化蒸馏水。我们构建了刺激-反应曲线,并通过内插法确定导致气道阻力(SRaw)较基线增加50%的雾化器激发输出量(PO50)。在另一天,受试者在吸入蒸馏水前30分钟吸入2.0mg硫酸阿托品。我们通过确定PO50值的比值,比较了吗啡和阿托品给药后与生理盐水给药后的支气管收缩反应。在13名受试者中,有7名受试者阿托品给药后PO50与生理盐水给药后PO50的比值大于2.0,阿托品被认为有效抑制了支气管收缩。按照类似标准,在这7名受试者中有5名吗啡也被认为有效。在其余6名受试者中,阿托品和吗啡均无效。通过卡方分析,我们发现吗啡和阿托品的抑制作用之间存在正相关(p<0.05)。在吗啡有效的5名受试者中,纳洛酮逆转了吗啡的抑制作用。与安慰剂(生理盐水)相比,阿托品引起了显著的基线支气管扩张,而吗啡则没有。我们得出结论,吗啡对阿片受体的刺激会抑制水诱导的支气管收缩中由迷走神经介导的成分。