Pratt-Johnson J A, Tillson G
Can J Ophthalmol. 1984 Aug;19(5):220-3.
Twenty-seven patients with esotropia and convergence excess (a high accommodative convergence/accommodation [AC/A] ratio) managed nonsurgically underwent a final standardized evaluation of their sensory and motor status after a follow-up period of at least 8 years. All had a deviation with distance fixation of less than 10 prism dioptres (PD) of esotropia with full optical correction both initially and throughout the follow-up period. The average spherical-equivalent refractive error was +2.3 D. The AC/A ratio had tended to decrease with age, and most patients had fusion, although only a small proportion had central fusion and stereopsis. Approximately half of the patients had been treated with bifocals, but their sensory outcome did not differ from that of the other patients. Miotics had not been used for more than a few months in any patient, as they were ineffective in reducing the deviation with near fixation to less than 10 PD of esotropia. A study, possibly a multicentre one, involving larger numbers of patients should be designed to find out whether bifocal therapy offers an advantage in the final sensory outcome of such patients.
27例患有内斜视且集合过强(调节性集合/调节[AC/A]比率高)的患者接受了非手术治疗,在至少8年的随访期后,对他们的感觉和运动状态进行了最终的标准化评估。所有患者在初始及整个随访期,经完全光学矫正后,远距离注视时的斜视度均小于10棱镜度(PD)。平均等效球镜屈光不正为+2.3 D。AC/A比率随年龄增长有下降趋势,大多数患者有融合功能,尽管只有一小部分患者有中心融合和立体视。约一半患者曾接受双焦点眼镜治疗,但其感觉结果与其他患者并无差异。在任何患者中,缩瞳剂使用时间均未超过几个月,因为它们在将近距离注视时的斜视度降低至小于10 PD内斜视方面无效。应该设计一项研究,可能是多中心研究,纳入更多患者,以确定双焦点眼镜疗法在此类患者的最终感觉结果方面是否具有优势。