Suppr超能文献

直接窦房结记录在人体中的新应用:窦房结恢复时间的评估

New application of direct sinus node recordings in man: assessment of sinus node recovery time.

作者信息

Gomes J A, Hariman R I, Chowdry I A

出版信息

Circulation. 1984 Oct;70(4):663-71. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.70.4.663.

Abstract

Sinus node recovery time (SNRT) is frequently used to assess sinus node function in patients with suspected sick sinus syndrome (SSS). Although SNRT is assumed to reflect sinus node automaticity, this assumption remains unproven. The purpose of this study was (1) to test the hypothesis that SNRT in patients with and without SSS reflects sinus node automaticity, and (2) to assess the role of sinoatrial conduction time in the measurement of SNRT. A total of 16 patients (mean +/- SD age 63 +/- 9 years), seven of which had SSS, form the basis of this report. An electrogram of the sinus node was obtained for each of the 16 patients, and overdrive pacing was performed in each at cycle lengths of 1000 to 300 msec. SNRT was measured (1) on the sinus node electrogram (direct method, measuring SNRTd) as the interval from the last pacing stimulus artifact to the onset of the upstroke slope of first postpacing sinus beat and (2) on the high right atrial electrogram (indirect method, measuring SNRTi). Results were as follows: (1) The longest SNRTd was significantly shorter than the longest SNRTi (989 +/- 304 vs 1309 +/- 356 msec, p less than .001). (2) For the first postpacing sinus beat there was a significant prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time as compared with that for sinus beats before pacing (319 +/- 152 vs 99 +/- 35 msec, p less than .001). Sinoatrial conduction time normalized within 3.6 +/- 0.96 postpacing sinus beats. (3) At the pacing cycle length that resulted in the longest recovery time, sinus node depression was seen in 56% of patients, sinus node acceleration was noted in 26%, and no appreciable change in sinus node automaticity was observed in 19%. (4) Sinoatrial conduction time for the sinus beat before pacing and that for the first postpacing beat was longer in patients with SSS when compared with in patients without SSS. (5) In patients with SSS the abnormal SNRTi, when corrected for the degree of prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time for the first postpacing beat, became normal in five of six patients. We conclude that (1) SNRTi reflects both sinus node automaticity and sinoatrial conduction time, whereas SNRTd reflects sinus node automaticity, (2) overdrive atrial pacing results in marked prolongation of sinoatrial conduction time for the first postpacing beat, which is longer in patients with SSS when compared with in those without SSS, and (3) in patients with SSS the inference of abnormal sinus node automaticity on the basis of a prolonged corrected SNRTi is usually incorrect.

摘要

窦房结恢复时间(SNRT)常用于评估疑似病态窦房结综合征(SSS)患者的窦房结功能。尽管SNRT被认为可反映窦房结自律性,但这一假设尚未得到证实。本研究的目的是:(1)检验有无SSS患者的SNRT反映窦房结自律性这一假设;(2)评估窦房传导时间在SNRT测量中的作用。本报告基于16例患者(平均±标准差年龄63±9岁),其中7例患有SSS。为16例患者中的每一位获取了窦房结电图,并以1000至300毫秒的周期长度进行超速起搏。测量SNRT的方法为:(1)在窦房结电图上(直接法,测量SNRTd),即从最后一个起搏刺激伪迹到第一个起搏后窦性搏动上升支起始的间期;(2)在高位右房电图上(间接法,测量SNRTi)。结果如下:(1)最长的SNRTd显著短于最长的SNRTi(989±304毫秒对1309±356毫秒,p<0.001)。(2)与起搏前的窦性搏动相比,第一个起搏后窦性搏动的窦房传导时间显著延长(319±152毫秒对99±35毫秒,p<0.001)。窦房传导时间在3.6±0.96个起搏后窦性搏动内恢复正常。(3)在导致最长恢复时间的起搏周期长度时,56%的患者出现窦房结抑制,26%的患者出现窦房结加速,19%的患者未观察到窦房结自律性有明显变化。(4)与无SSS的患者相比,SSS患者起搏前窦性搏动和第一个起搏后搏动的窦房传导时间更长。(5)在SSS患者中,6例患者中有5例在根据第一个起搏后搏动的窦房传导时间延长程度进行校正后,异常的SNRTi变为正常。我们得出结论:(1)SNRTi既反映窦房结自律性,也反映窦房传导时间,而SNRTd仅反映窦房结自律性;(2)超速心房起搏导致第一个起搏后搏动的窦房传导时间显著延长,SSS患者的该时间比无SSS的患者更长;(3)在SSS患者中,基于校正后SNRTi延长推断窦房结自律性异常通常是错误的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验