Wigal T, Kucharski D, Spear N E
Dev Psychobiol. 1984 Sep;17(5):555-70. doi: 10.1002/dev.420170512.
For rats 16- or 28-days-old postnatal, we tested the source of the facilitation in instrumental learning provided by odors from home nest materials. Three experiments confirmed that acquisition of a spatial discrimination (to escape footshock) was facilitated not only by the presence of typical nest odors in the training context, but also by the presence of a non-rat odor (banana) to which the animals had been familiarized for 4 hr/day for 7 days. There was a borderline tendency for a similar facilitation after familiarization to the latter odor for only 10 min. These effects occurred for rats 16 days postnatal but not for those 28 days old. The experiments also confirmed that the prior exposure to non-rat odors did not in itself, in the absence of that odor during learning, affect discriminated escape learning, and that enhanced affinity for a contextual odor is not a sufficient condition for enhancement of learning in its presence. There was some indication that the 16-day-old rat was more likely to select a discriminative odor to guide their choice of spatial locations if a familiar contextual odor was present.
对于出生后16天或28天的大鼠,我们测试了来自家巢材料气味在工具性学习中促进作用的来源。三项实验证实,空间辨别(以逃避电击)的习得不仅受到训练环境中典型巢气味的促进,还受到一种非大鼠气味(香蕉)的促进,动物已连续7天每天接触该气味4小时。仅对后一种气味熟悉10分钟后,也有类似促进作用的临界趋势。这些效应在出生后16天的大鼠中出现,但在28天大的大鼠中未出现。实验还证实,在学习过程中不存在该气味的情况下,预先接触非大鼠气味本身并不会影响辨别性逃避学习,并且对背景气味增强的亲和力并不是该气味存在时学习增强的充分条件。有迹象表明,如果存在熟悉的背景气味,16天大的大鼠更有可能选择一种辨别性气味来指导它们对空间位置的选择。