Ryan J J, Georgemiller R J, McKinney B E
J Clin Psychol. 1984 Jul;40(4):1033-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198407)40:4<1033::aid-jclp2270400428>3.0.co;2-c.
Investigated the validity of the Arithmetic + Vocabulary + Picture Arrangement + Block Design subtest combination as an estimate of the WAIS-R Full Scale IQ in a sample of 55 elderly patients. The correlation between the short-form IQ and the WAIS-R Full Scale IQ was highly significant, r(53) = .95, p less than .001. A pairwise t-test computed between the mean IQs for the two forms was nonsignificant, t(54) less than 1. Approximately one-fourth of the Ss showed changes in intelligence classification levels when the short form was used. The short form does not provide a precise estimate of IQ; however, it appears to have clinical utility as a screening device to identify patients with atypical cognitive functioning. The short form correctly categorized 84% of the current sample with respect to the presence or absence of abnormalities on the full WAIS-R.
在55名老年患者样本中,研究了算术+词汇+图片排列+积木图案分测验组合作为韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)全量表智商估计值的有效性。简式智商与WAIS-R全量表智商之间的相关性非常显著,r(53) = .95,p小于.001。对两种形式的平均智商进行的成对t检验无显著性差异,t(54) 小于1。当使用简式时,约四分之一的受试者在智力分类水平上出现了变化。简式不能提供精确的智商估计值;然而,它作为一种筛查工具,用于识别认知功能异常的患者,似乎具有临床实用性。就WAIS-R全量表上是否存在异常而言,简式正确地将当前样本中的84%进行了分类。