Suppr超能文献

作为韦氏成人智力量表简式的言语智商的比较效度。

Comparative validity of the verbal IQ as a short form of the WAIS.

作者信息

Gibson R O

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1981 Oct;37(4):843-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198110)37:4<843::aid-jclp2270370428>3.0.co;2-z.

Abstract

Wildman and Wildman's (1977) conclusion concerning the effectiveness of the Verbal IQ as a Short Form of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) was investigated further using the three Resnick and Entin criteria for validation. Influence of age and IQ range was controlled. In addition, the Verbal IQ was compared statistically with another six-subtest short form. The WAIS protocols of 100 psychiatric inpatients provided the basic data. Only for ages 18 to 44 and the IQ range of 90 and above were both short forms found to satisfy all three of the validity criteria. The Verbal IQ significantly overestimated the Full Scale IQ in the total sample, while the comparison short form significantly underestimated it. Correlations for both short forms with the standard WAIS were high. The Verbal IQ correctly classified 73% of the Ss in the Wechsler intelligence levels compared to 81% for the comparison WAIS abbreviation. The overall performance of the two forms was not significantly different.

摘要

运用雷斯尼克和恩廷的三条效度标准,对怀尔德曼和怀尔德曼(1977年)关于言语智商作为韦氏成人智力量表(WAIS)简式有效性的结论进行了进一步研究。年龄和智商范围的影响得到了控制。此外,还对言语智商与另一种六个分测验的简式进行了统计学比较。100名精神病住院患者的WAIS测验记录提供了基础数据。只有年龄在18至44岁之间且智商在90及以上时,两种简式才都被发现满足所有三条效度标准。言语智商在总样本中显著高估了全量表智商,而与之比较的简式则显著低估了全量表智商。两种简式与标准WAIS的相关性都很高。在韦氏智力水平方面,言语智商正确分类了73%的受试者,而与之比较的WAIS简式则为81%。两种形式的总体表现没有显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验