Powell L H, Friedman M, Thoresen C E, Gill J J, Ulmer D K
Psychosom Med. 1984 Jul-Aug;46(4):293-313. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198407000-00001.
The feasibility of altering a Type A style of life was investigated in 1012 nonsmoking predominantly male postinfarction volunteers in the San Francisco Bay area. A total of 862 were randomly allocated into an experimental section receiving a combination of Type A and cardiac counseling, or a control section receiving cardiac counseling alone. The remaining 150 formed a nonrandom but statistically equivalent comparison section. Assessments of change in Type A behavior were made by the participant, his or her spouse, a work colleague, and an independent rater of a videotaped structured interview. Psychometric analyses indicated that these instruments were valid and reliable measures of Type A behavior. After 24 months, participants receiving Type A/cardiac counseling exhibited a significantly greater reduction in Type A behavior than the other two sections, and had a lower cardiovascular recurrence rate than the comparison section only. No differences among the three sections were observed in total cholesterol or resting blood pressure. The results suggest that Type A behavior can be altered by group counseling in postinfarction volunteers and that such alteration is superior to no group counseling at all in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.
在旧金山湾区,对1012名主要为男性的非吸烟心肌梗死后志愿者改变A型生活方式的可行性进行了研究。总共862人被随机分配到一个实验组,接受A型行为和心脏咨询相结合的治疗,或一个对照组,仅接受心脏咨询。其余150人组成一个非随机但在统计学上等效的比较组。通过参与者本人、其配偶、同事以及对录像结构化访谈进行独立评分的人员对A型行为的变化进行评估。心理测量分析表明,这些工具是衡量A型行为的有效且可靠的指标。24个月后,接受A型行为/心脏咨询的参与者在A型行为方面的减少幅度明显大于其他两组,并且仅与比较组相比,心血管复发率更低。三组在总胆固醇或静息血压方面未观察到差异。结果表明,心肌梗死后志愿者通过团体咨询可以改变A型行为,并且在冠心病的二级预防中,这种改变优于完全不进行团体咨询。