John J
Int J Rehabil Res. 1984;7(2):173-81.
The M.R.C. scale for grading muscle power in stages from 0 to 5 has been compared with an analogue scale in which power is expressed as a percentage of the maximum expected for that muscle. Twenty therapists examined many patients in a series of comparative tests. The M.R.C. grade is more reliable and accurate for this type of clinical assessment in weak muscles, that is grades 0-3 on the M.R.C. scale or 0-62% on the analogue scale. The analogue scale is more reliable and accurate for the assessment of stronger muscles, that is grades 4 and 5 of the M.R.C. scale or 62-100% on the analogue scale. Therefore, analogue scales could be usefully adopted when testing bulky muscles operating at 50% or more of their normal power.
医学研究委员会(M.R.C.)制定的用于分阶段评估肌肉力量的0至5级量表,已与一种类比量表进行了比较。在类比量表中,力量以该肌肉预期最大力量的百分比来表示。二十名治疗师在一系列对比测试中检查了许多患者。对于弱肌的此类临床评估,即M.R.C.量表中的0至3级或类比量表中的0至62%,M.R.C.分级更为可靠和准确。对于较强肌肉的评估,即M.R.C.量表中的4级和5级或类比量表中的62%至100%,类比量表更为可靠和准确。因此,在测试以其正常力量的50%或更高水平运作的大块肌肉时,类比量表可能会很有用。