Wadsworth C T, Krishnan R, Sear M, Harrold J, Nielsen D H
Phys Ther. 1987 Sep;67(9):1342-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.9.1342.
Physical therapists require an accurate, reliable method for measuring muscle strength. They often use manual muscle testing or hand-held dynametric muscle testing (DMT), but few studies document the reliability of MMT or compare the reliability of the two types of testing. We designed this study to determine the intrarater reliability of MMT and DMT. A physical therapist performed manual and dynametric strength tests of the same five muscle groups on 11 patients and then repeated the tests two days later. The correlation coefficients were high and significantly different from zero for four muscle groups tested dynametrically and for two muscle groups tested manually. The test-retest reliability coefficients for two muscle groups tested manually could not be calculated because the values between subjects were identical. We concluded that both MMT and DMT are reliable testing methods, given the conditions described in this study. Both testing methods have specific applications and limitations, which we discuss.
物理治疗师需要一种准确、可靠的方法来测量肌肉力量。他们通常使用徒手肌力测试或手持测力计肌肉测试(DMT),但很少有研究记录徒手肌力测试的可靠性或比较这两种测试方法的可靠性。我们设计了这项研究,以确定徒手肌力测试和测力计测试的评估者内可靠性。一名物理治疗师对11名患者的相同五组肌肉进行了徒手和测力计力量测试,然后在两天后重复测试。对于通过测力计测试的四组肌肉和通过徒手测试的两组肌肉,相关系数很高且显著不同于零。由于受试者之间的值相同,无法计算通过徒手测试的两组肌肉的重测可靠性系数。我们得出结论,在本研究所述的条件下,徒手肌力测试和测力计测试都是可靠的测试方法。两种测试方法都有特定的应用和局限性,我们将对此进行讨论。