• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子数字血压计的评估:故障率与准确性

Evaluation of electronic, digital blood pressure monitors: failure rates and accuracy.

作者信息

Carroll K K, Latman N S

出版信息

Med Instrum. 1984 Sep-Oct;18(5):263-7.

PMID:6493099
Abstract

Four electronic, digital blood pressure monitors intended for home use were evaluated for failure rate and accuracy. Blood pressures from the electronic monitors were compared to standard clinical, manual auscultatory blood pressure measurements, concurrently and sequentially recorded. The instruments were evaluated for accuracy by linear regression and coefficients of correction. Wide variations were observed in the accuracy and failure rates of these monitors. It appears, therefore, that there are significant differences between the various electronic, digital blood pressure monitors available. Some of these may not be suitable for home use at the present time.

摘要

对四款家用电子数字血压计的故障率和准确性进行了评估。将电子血压计测量的血压与标准临床手动听诊血压测量结果进行比较,同时并按顺序记录。通过线性回归和校正系数对这些仪器的准确性进行评估。观察到这些血压计在准确性和故障率方面存在很大差异。因此,目前市面上各种电子数字血压计之间似乎存在显著差异。其中一些目前可能不适合家庭使用。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of electronic, digital blood pressure monitors: failure rates and accuracy.电子数字血压计的评估:故障率与准确性
Med Instrum. 1984 Sep-Oct;18(5):263-7.
2
Home health-care: accuracy, calibration, exhaust, and failure rate comparisons of digital blood pressure monitors.家庭医疗保健:数字血压监测仪的准确性、校准、排气及故障率比较
Med Instrum. 1987 Dec;21(6):323-8.
3
Evaluation of electronic, digital blood pressure monitors: perceptions and ease of operation.电子数字血压计的评估:认知与操作便利性
Med Instrum. 1985 Nov-Dec;19(6):261-7.
4
Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.示波脉搏振幅包络线形状及其特征比率对听诊法和示波法血压测量差异的影响。
Blood Press Monit. 2007 Oct;12(5):297-305. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32826fb773.
5
Short-term variation in blood pressure determines the accuracy of simultaneous and sequential recordings in the validation of blood pressure measuring devices.血压的短期变化决定了在血压测量设备验证中同步和连续记录的准确性。
J Hum Hypertens. 1993 Aug;7(4):315-9.
6
Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.自动血压测量:示波法波形形状是导致示波法与听诊法血压测量结果差异的一个潜在因素。
J Hypertens. 2008 Jan;26(1):35-43. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f06ec7.
7
Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: a randomized crossover trial.自动与手动血压测量:一项随机交叉试验。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2008 Aug;14(4):296-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2008.00696.x.
8
Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device with manual pressure registration (PMS Mandaus).具有手动压力记录功能的无汞数字听诊设备(PMS Mandaus)的验证。
Blood Press Monit. 2006 Jun;11(3):161-4. doi: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000209076.15461.25.
9
Can simulators evaluate systematic differences between oscillometric non-invasive blood-pressure monitors?模拟器能否评估示波法无创血压监测仪之间的系统差异?
Blood Press Monit. 2000 Apr;5(2):81-9.
10
[Comparative clinical study on the accuracy of conventional and electronic blood pressure self-measuring devices (author's transl)].传统与电子血压自测设备准确性的比较临床研究(作者译)
Z Kardiol. 1981 Sep;70(9):700-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiovascular reactivity to a naturally occurring stressor: development and psychometric evaluation of a psychophysiological assessment procedure.对自然发生应激源的心血管反应性:一种心理生理评估程序的开发与心理测量学评价
J Behav Med. 1997 Dec;20(6):551-70. doi: 10.1023/a:1025566408046.
2
Recommendations on self-measurement of blood pressure. Canadian Coalition for High Blood Pressure Prevention and Control.血压自我测量建议。加拿大高血压预防与控制联盟。
CMAJ. 1988 Jun 15;138(12):1093-6.