Matsumoto Y, Inui J, Hashimoto K
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1984 Sep;327(2):156-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00500911.
Responses of ring segments of the isolated canine coronary artery superfused with arterial blood from a donor dog were compared with responses of segments superfused with Krebs-Henseleit (K-H) solution. KC1 (1 - 30 mg) caused contraction in a dose-dependent manner both in K-H solution- and in blood-superfused preparation. However, CaCl2 (1 - 100 mg) and nifedipine (0.1 - 30 micrograms) contracted and relaxed, respectively, only blood-superfused preparation but not K-H solution-superfused one. These results show that even in the same region of the coronary artery, different superfusates result in different responses to contracting or relaxing agents. This difference may be explained by the idea that Ca2+-channels are activated and endow basal tension in blood-superfused preparations, but not in K-H solution-superfused ones.
将来自供体犬的动脉血灌注的离体犬冠状动脉环段的反应与用Krebs-Henseleit(K-H)溶液灌注的环段的反应进行了比较。KCl(1 - 30毫克)在K-H溶液灌注和血液灌注的制剂中均以剂量依赖性方式引起收缩。然而,CaCl2(1 - 100毫克)和硝苯地平(0.1 - 30微克)分别仅使血液灌注的制剂收缩和舒张,而对K-H溶液灌注的制剂无此作用。这些结果表明,即使在冠状动脉的同一区域,不同的灌注液对收缩或舒张剂也会产生不同的反应。这种差异可能是由于Ca2+通道在血液灌注的制剂中被激活并赋予基础张力,而在K-H溶液灌注的制剂中则不然。