Miller J A, Nachemson A L, Schultz A B
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 Sep;9(6):632-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198409000-00015.
Despite the wide use of bracing for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis, controlled studies apparently have not been performed to examine whether bracing, in fact, alters the natural history of spine lateral curves. We studied 255 female patients, ages 8-17 years, with idiopathic scoliosis who had curves with initial Cobb measures from 15-30 degrees. They were divided into two groups: one group consisted of 144 patients who had received a Milwaukee or Boston brace; and the other, a control group, consisted of 111 patients who remained untreated through a mean period of 1.9 years. The groups had similar mean ages, ages of menarche and curve severities. The results showed a slight but nonsignificant trend, suggesting that bracing reduced the overall probability of progression in the braced curves. However, noting that nearly 75% of the control group curves were nonprogressive, it is possible that a similar proportion of the braced curves need not have been braced. Moreover, bracing failed to prevent eight curves in seven patients (5%) from progressing. These curves progressed at a mean rate of 8 degrees per year. Our retrospective results suggest that bracing probably is not necessary in a large proportion of patients who meet current, clinical criteria for bracing. Given the limitations of retrospective studies like this one, a controlled prospective trial of bracing effectiveness in idiopathic scoliosis seems warranted.
尽管支具在特发性脊柱侧凸治疗中应用广泛,但显然尚未进行对照研究来检验支具是否真的会改变脊柱侧弯的自然病程。我们研究了255名年龄在8至17岁之间的特发性脊柱侧凸女性患者,她们的初始Cobb角测量值为15至30度。这些患者被分为两组:一组由144名接受密尔沃基或波士顿支具治疗的患者组成;另一组为对照组,由111名未经治疗、平均观察期为1.9年的患者组成。两组患者的平均年龄、初潮年龄和侧弯严重程度相似。结果显示出一种轻微但无统计学意义的趋势,表明支具降低了支具治疗侧弯进展的总体概率。然而,注意到对照组中近75%的侧弯未进展,有可能支具治疗组中同样比例的侧弯不需要使用支具。此外,支具未能阻止7名患者(5%)的8条侧弯进展。这些侧弯平均每年进展8度。我们的回顾性研究结果表明,对于大多数符合当前临床支具治疗标准的患者,支具治疗可能并无必要。鉴于此类回顾性研究的局限性,开展一项关于特发性脊柱侧凸支具治疗效果的对照前瞻性试验似乎很有必要。