Suppr超能文献

职业性癌症的流行病学发现。

Epidemiological discovery of occupational cancers.

作者信息

Doll R

出版信息

Ann Acad Med Singap. 1984 Apr;13(2 Suppl):331-9.

PMID:6497335
Abstract

Most occupational hazards of cancer that have been recognized have been discovered as a result of clinical intuition or epidemiological observation. Most could, however, have been avoided if modern laboratory techniques had been used to test the substances used before men and women were deliberately exposed to them. Industry must be expected to use such tests in the future and it is hoped that few occupational hazards of cancer will be introduced. Laboratory studies, however, are not 100% reliable as predictors of human risk and epidemiological observations will continue to be required to: detect existing hazards that have been overlooked, pick up new hazards that were not predicted by laboratory investigation, determine the level of risk that is socially acceptable, if a carcinogenic agent has to be used, and sometimes to demonstrate the safety of an agent that has been suspected of causing a hazard to man on uncertain grounds. The ways in which epidemiological observations can be used for these purposes are discussed.

摘要

大多数已被认识到的职业性癌症危害是临床直觉或流行病学观察的结果。然而,如果在男性和女性被故意接触某些物质之前,就运用现代实验室技术对这些物质进行检测,那么大多数危害本可避免。未来有望工业界采用此类检测,并且希望由此引入的职业性癌症危害会很少。然而,实验室研究作为人类风险的预测指标并非100%可靠,因此仍将继续需要进行流行病学观察,以:发现被忽视的现有危害,识别实验室调查未预测到的新危害,确定社会可接受的风险水平(如果必须使用致癌剂),以及有时证明一种因不确定理由而被怀疑对人类有危害的物质的安全性。本文讨论了将流行病学观察用于这些目的的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验