Koehler K
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1984 Oct;52(10):329-37. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1002030.
The various solutions that have been proposed with respect to the body-mind problem can be more or less regarded as variations on three traditional models. Since the time of Descartes the philosophical position of hylomorphism has been almost forgotten and the influence of the dualist point of view has also been greatly reduced. In contrast, reductionism in the form of materialistic monism has gained immense popularity, especially in psychiatric circles. The present paper summarizes these different approaches but primarily focuses on certain aspects of a modified form of hylomorphism as developed by Thomas Aquinas. These latter considerations are then drawn upon as the basis for a critique of Kurt Schneiders so-called aristotelean-scholastic or metagenic interpretation with regard to the endogenous psychoses.
针对身心问题提出的各种解决方案，或多或少都可被视为三种传统模式的变体。自笛卡尔时代以来，质形论的哲学立场几乎已被遗忘，二元论观点的影响也大幅减弱。相比之下，唯物一元论形式的还原论却广受欢迎，尤其是在精神病学界。本文总结了这些不同的方法，但主要关注托马斯·阿奎那所发展的一种修正形式的质形论的某些方面。随后，这些思考被用作批判库尔特·施耐德关于内源性精神病的所谓亚里士多德 - 经院哲学或后生解释的基础。
