Suppr超能文献

压力政治学:空中交通管制的案例

The politics of stress: the case of air traffic control.

作者信息

Tesh S

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 1984;14(4):569-87. doi: 10.2190/JH2E-F62P-WMX8-7NQF.

Abstract

Analysis of the 1981 Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization strike suggests that workers who employ the concept of stress to describe undesirable job conditions risk unexpected negative consequences. In deciding not to make subjective claims that can only be addressed in political terms, workers necessarily appeal to outside experts to provide scientific, objective descriptions of job conditions. Unfortunately, different experts define stress in strikingly different ways, allowing for a kind of shell game in which the very existence of stress can become problematical. In addition, the stress experts have been unable to offer more than weak data to support the theories that link difficult working conditions to pathological outcomes. Thus workers are likely to lose labor disputes that depend on the stress discourse. A major reason for such an outcome is that job conditions, as part of the social world, lend themselves poorly to a form of inquiry designed to investigate the physical world.

摘要

对1981年专业航空交通管制员组织罢工事件的分析表明,那些用压力概念来描述不良工作条件的工人可能会面临意想不到的负面后果。在决定不提出只能从政治角度解决的主观诉求时,工人们必然会求助于外部专家,以获得对工作条件的科学、客观描述。不幸的是,不同的专家对压力的定义截然不同,这就导致了一种类似于骗局的情况,即压力的存在本身都可能成为问题。此外,压力专家所能提供的支持将恶劣工作条件与病理结果联系起来的理论的数据非常薄弱。因此,工人在依赖压力话语的劳资纠纷中可能会失败。出现这种结果的一个主要原因是,工作条件作为社会世界的一部分,很难用旨在研究物质世界的调查形式来进行探究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验